H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Bettina Bunge H2H: 0-2

Bettina Bunge holds a 2–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Bettina Bunge leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Bettina Bunge won the 1979 Sydney International semifinal 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Bettina Bunge
GER Age 63 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Bettina Bunge 6-3 6-3 Renata Tomanova Match data Dec 22, 1979* SF Sydney International WTA 500 Grass
Bettina Bunge 6-3 6-7 6-4 Renata Tomanova Match data Apr 12, 1979* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,948 225 213 51.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Bettina Bunge — #7 58 2,121 294 182 61.8% 0 0 0 1 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Bettina Bunge
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 1978 2–2 50.0% — 1,533 0 0
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1979 16–20 44.4% — 1,699 0 0
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1980 31–23 57.4% — 1,885 0 0
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1981 50–23 68.5% #9 2,027 0 0
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1982 43–21 67.2% #9 2,011 0 4
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1983 26–11 70.3% #7 2,010 0 5
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,848 0 8 1984 28–21 57.1% #21 1,909 0 5
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,860 0 9 1985 25–17 59.5% — 1,846 0 5
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,761 0 9 1986 34–20 63.0% #12 2,016 0 5
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,692 0 9 1987 32–19 62.7% #15 1,936 0 5
25 1980 24–23 51.1% — 1,680 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,681 0 9 1989 7–5 58.3% #72 1,927 0 5
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,692 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,533 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Bettina Bunge
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1978 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1979 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 11 10 21 52.4%
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 25 11 36 69.4%
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1982 6 3 9 66.7% 9 5 14 64.3% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 11 28 60.7%
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 — — — — 10 4 14 71.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2%
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1984 8 4 12 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 12 6 18 66.7% 6 7 13 46.2%
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1985 9 5 14 64.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 13 8 21 61.9%
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1987 14 5 19 73.7% 6 5 11 54.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 6 14 57.1%
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1989 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 22 47 69 31.9% — 73 41 114 64.0% 55 36 91 60.4% 63 35 98 64.3% 100 70 170 58.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Bettina Bunge
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 1978 1533 104.3 — — — — +86 — — 55.6% -0.22 0–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.06
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1979 1699 137.7 — — — — -79 -104 +10 45.0% -0.31 5–5 (50%) 4–5 (44%) 104.2 +0.20
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1980 1885 156.5 — — — — -84 -197 -79 57.3% +0.69 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 102.0 -5.93
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.54 1981 2027 161.4 — — — — 0 -285 -113 64.3% +1.20 12–7 (63%) 11–2 (85%) 110.3 -3.43
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +1.96 1982 2011 162.0 — — — — -24 -182 -43 64.0% +1.24 7–5 (58%) 6–10 (38%) 98.2 -3.95
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +119 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.83 1983 2011 158.7 — — — — +80 -107 -72 69.6% +1.56 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 97.6 -1.66
21 1976 1849 141.0 — — — — -235 +74 -173 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.94 1984 1909 146.3 — — — — +51 -109 +54 56.4% +0.62 8–6 (57%) 9–5 (64%) 102.9 -3.24
22 1977 1861 152.7 — — — — -166 +102 -183 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.43 1985 1847 154.1 — — — — +42 -10 +97 61.1% +1.04 3–5 (38%) 4–6 (40%) 96.3 -2.92
23 1978 1761 130.1 — — — — -89 +113 +14 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.3 +1.25 1986 2016 163.3 — — — — +9 -153 -24 59.2% +0.74 11–6 (65%) 8–6 (57%) 106.1 -5.55
24 1979 1692 132.4 — — — — -98 +239 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.72 1987 1936 153.3 — — — — +62 -100 +10 62.7% +1.05 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.6 -1.05
25 1980 1681 127.8 — — — — -128 +207 +28 51.9% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 1682 123.3 — — — — -26 +171 -14 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.3 +0.42 1989 1928 139.1 — — — — +25 — — 57.7% +0.77 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 99.1 -0.42
27 1982 1693 123.3 — — — — -75 +88 -13 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +87 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1581 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1570 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1533 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1948 138.0 — — — — -122 +120 -54 50.6% +0.03 70–57 (55%) 31–33 (48%) 101.2 -0.68 — 2121 162.0 — — — — +7 -130 -15 60.3% +0.89 62–49 (56%) 57–51 (53%) 105.8 -5.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.