H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 0-4
Hana Mandlikova holds a 4–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 3–0 on grass and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1980 Perugia quarterfinal 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 1980* | Perugia | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Hana Mandlikova | 7-6 6-1 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Dec 7, 1979* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 6-2 6-4 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Dec 15, 1978* | Adelaide | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 7-5 6-3 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| Dec 7, 1978* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 7-6 4-6 6-4 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Hana Mandlikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |