H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Ilana Kloss H2H: 3-1
Renata Tomanova holds a 3–1 lead over Ilana Kloss in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Renata Tomanova leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Ilana Kloss won the 1979 Eastbourne second round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 70
Left-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 20, 1979* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Ilana Kloss | 6-2 7-6 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| May 17, 1979* | Vienna | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 6-4 0-6 6-1 | Ilana Kloss | Match data |
| Jan 13, 1977* | Hollywood | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Renata Tomanova | 6-2 6-2 | Ilana Kloss | Match data |
| Jun 6, 1976* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 7-5 6-1 | Ilana Kloss | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Ilana Kloss | — | — | — | 1,888 | 135 | 144 | 48.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Ilana Kloss | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,559 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 13–12 | 52.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 3 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,869 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,811 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 9–20 | 31.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1976 | 18–15 | 54.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,667 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1978 | 14–11 | 56.0% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1979 | 15–26 | 36.6% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | 1980 | 0–7 | 0.0% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |