H2H data updated: 2026-11-05 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-1

Kathy Horvath holds a 1–0 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1982 Charleston Open round of 64 6-0 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kathy Horvath
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Horvath 6-0 6-1 Renata Tomanova Match data Apr 7, 1982* R64 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,948 225 213 51.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Kathy Horvath — #10 24 1,976 187 155 54.7% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Kathy Horvath
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1979 0–2 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1980 6–7 46.2% — 1,565 0 0
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 1981 34–23 59.6% — 1,860 0 2
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1982 15–17 46.9% — 1,776 0 2
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1983 39–18 68.4% — 1,931 0 4
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1984 25–19 56.8% #29 1,800 0 4
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1985 23–16 59.0% — 1,776 0 6
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1986 16–15 51.6% #47 1,740 0 6
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,848 0 8 1987 18–15 54.5% #37 1,714 0 7
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,860 0 9 1988 9–15 37.5% #85 1,603 0 7
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,761 0 9 1989 2–8 20.0% #224 1,529 0 7
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,692 0 9 — — — — — — —
25 1980 24–23 51.1% — 1,680 0 9 — — — — — — —
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,681 0 9 — — — — — — —
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,692 0 9 — — — — — — —
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,597 0 9 — — — — — — —
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 — — — — — — —
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,533 0 9 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Kathy Horvath
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 5 4 9 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 15 8 23 65.2% — — — — 12 11 23 52.2%
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 7 9 22.2%
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1983 9 4 13 69.2% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0%
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1984 0 5 5 0.0% 21 9 30 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 6 5 11 54.5% 17 7 24 70.8% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 8 7 15 53.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1987 6 6 12 50.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 7 9 16 43.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1989 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 22 47 69 31.9% — 45 50 95 47.4% 111 67 178 62.4% 3 6 9 33.3% 28 32 60 46.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Kathy Horvath
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1497 113.4 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.20 0–1 0–1 — -0.25
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1565 110.9 — — — — +47 -65 — 43.3% -0.37 3–1 (75%) 1–3 (25%) 101.9 -0.11
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 1981 1860 146.7 — — — — -39 -79 — 55.9% +0.43 12–7 (63%) 7–5 (58%) 109.3 +0.11
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1982 1776 143.4 — — — — -40 +61 — 52.9% +0.46 1–7 (13%) 2–3 (40%) 92.6 -3.75
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1983 1931 149.2 — — — — -63 +56 — 63.7% +0.74 9–3 (75%) 11–6 (65%) 109.3 +1.20
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.54 1984 1800 146.8 — — — — -83 +207 — 56.1% +0.43 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) 94.7 +0.22
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +1.96 1985 1776 138.1 — — — — -111 +221 — 55.8% +0.24 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.1 -0.66
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +119 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.83 1986 1740 130.5 — — — — -74 +185 -139 48.6% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–3 (50%) 104.3 -1.03
21 1976 1849 141.0 — — — — -235 +74 -173 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.94 1987 1714 126.0 — — — — -42 +149 — 54.1% +0.18 6–4 (60%) 3–2 (60%) 101.2 +3.31
22 1977 1861 152.7 — — — — -166 +102 -183 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.43 1988 1603 116.3 — — — — +8 +113 — 41.5% -0.64 1–4 (20%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.35
23 1978 1761 130.1 — — — — -89 +113 +14 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.3 +1.25 1989 1530 101.0 — — — — +18 — — 33.3% -1.38 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 95.4 +0.25
24 1979 1692 132.4 — — — — -98 +239 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1980 1681 127.8 — — — — -128 +207 +28 51.9% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 2–3 (40%) 97.4 +0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1981 1682 123.3 — — — — -26 +171 -14 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.3 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1982 1693 123.3 — — — — -75 +88 -13 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +87 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — -0.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1984 1581 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1985 1570 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1986 1533 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1948 138.0 — — — — -122 +120 -54 50.6% +0.03 70–57 (55%) 31–33 (48%) 101.2 -0.68 — 1976 144.1 — — — — -48 +106 -139 53.7% +0.21 50–40 (56%) 39–36 (52%) 103.7 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.