H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Renata Tomanova vs Tanya Harford H2H: 1-1
Renata Tomanova and Tanya Harford are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tanya Harford leads 1–0 on carpet, while Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1981 Mahwah second round 6-7 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 67
Right-Handed
162 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 1981* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Renata Tomanova | 6-7 6-4 6-4 | Tanya Harford | Match data |
| Feb 7, 1980* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Tanya Harford | 1-6 6-0 6-1 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Tanya Harford | — | — | — | 1,786 | 50 | 71 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Renata Tomanova | Tanya Harford | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 | 1978 | 3–6 | 33.3% | — | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 | 1979 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,719 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 | 1980 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 | 1981 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 | 1982 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |