H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Renata Tomanova vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 1-2

Yvonne Vermaak holds a 2–1 lead over Renata Tomanova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Renata Tomanova leads 1–0 on carpet, while Yvonne Vermaak leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1981 Kitzbuhel round of 16 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Renata Tomanova
GER Age 71 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main-draw meetings
Yvonne Vermaak
RSA Age 69 Right-Handed 155 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yvonne Vermaak 6-4 6-4 Renata Tomanova Match data Jul 17, 1981* R16 Kitzbuhel WTA 250 Clay
Yvonne Vermaak 2-6 6-2 6-0 Renata Tomanova Match data Aug 17, 1978* R32 Canadian Open WTA 250 Hard
Renata Tomanova 7-6 6-3 Yvonne Vermaak Match data Jan 12, 1978* R32 Hollywood WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Renata Tomanova — — — 1,945 223 212 51.3% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Yvonne Vermaak #558 #38 10 1,892 239 249 49.0% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Renata Tomanova Yvonne Vermaak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,500 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1971 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0 1973 0–2 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
17 1972 0–2 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,489 0 0
18 1973 18–14 56.2% — 1,615 0 0 1975 15–12 55.6% — 1,599 0 0
19 1974 21–13 61.8% — 1,719 0 4 1976 8–10 44.4% — 1,606 0 1
20 1975 23–16 59.0% — 1,813 0 6 1977 20–14 58.8% — 1,765 0 2
21 1976 28–22 56.0% — 1,847 0 8 1978 29–23 55.8% — 1,791 0 2
22 1977 28–26 51.9% — 1,858 0 9 1979 15–23 39.5% — 1,779 0 2
23 1978 28–25 52.8% — 1,759 0 9 1980 19–18 51.4% — 1,741 0 2
24 1979 21–26 44.7% — 1,691 0 9 1981 19–28 40.4% — 1,719 0 2
25 1980 22–22 50.0% — 1,678 0 9 1982 36–27 57.1% — 1,820 0 2
26 1981 18–16 52.9% — 1,680 0 9 1983 33–26 55.9% — 1,754 0 4
27 1982 9–12 42.9% — 1,691 0 9 1984 29–28 50.9% #41 1,800 0 5
28 1983 1–8 11.1% — 1,596 0 9 1985 8–21 27.6% #41 1,604 0 5
29 1984 0–1 0.0% — 1,580 0 9 1986 6–11 35.3% #104 1,565 0 5
30 1985 1–2 33.3% — 1,569 0 9 1987 1–3 25.0% #201 1,558 0 5
31 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,532 0 9 1988 0–1 0.0% #287 1,541 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Renata Tomanova Yvonne Vermaak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1970 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1973 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1972 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1974 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1973 — — — — 17 9 26 65.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
19 1974 — — — — 19 8 27 70.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1975 2 2 4 50.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1977 3 2 5 60.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1976 2 1 3 66.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 6 6 0.0% 1978 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
22 1977 1 5 6 16.7% 17 7 24 70.8% 3 4 7 42.9% 7 10 17 41.2% 1979 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 9 11 18.2%
23 1978 4 4 8 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 1980 2 5 7 28.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
24 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1981 7 9 16 43.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%
25 1980 5 6 11 45.5% 10 7 17 58.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 10 20 50.0%
26 1981 5 4 9 55.6% 8 6 14 57.1% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 14 4 18 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 9 13 30.8%
27 1982 1 2 3 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1984 12 7 19 63.2% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2%
28 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
29 1984 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 1985 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1986 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 32 53 39.6% 130 86 216 60.2% 41 43 84 48.8% 20 46 66 30.3% — 72 64 136 52.9% 78 72 150 52.0% 55 44 99 55.6% 33 68 101 32.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Renata Tomanova Yvonne Vermaak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1970 1500 96.0 — — — — +67 -2 — 40.0% -0.50 4–0 (100%) — — +1.89 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1971 1499 98.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.25 — — — +0.64 1973 1496 101.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — -0.39
17 1972 1481 96.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.01 1974 1489 99.2 — — — — +44 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.69
18 1973 1615 134.4 — — — — -83 +113 — 52.1% +0.38 7–2 (78%) 1–2 (33%) 106.4 +2.79 1975 1599 120.1 — — — — +53 -2 -47 57.1% +0.46 3–6 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +2.43
19 1974 1720 129.8 — — — — -209 +100 — 58.7% +0.75 7–2 (78%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +2.40 1976 1607 119.9 — — — — -10 +40 — 48.8% +0.09 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.96
20 1975 1814 140.9 — — — — -168 +118 -259 54.4% +0.01 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.1 -2.52 1977 1765 138.0 — — — — -79 -79 -75 58.1% +0.41 3–3 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 102.4 +0.27
21 1976 1847 140.8 — — — — -234 +75 -172 54.5% +0.33 6–6 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 98.4 -2.73 1978 1791 135.3 — — — — +3 -132 -30 52.6% +0.33 8–6 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 99.2 +2.99
22 1977 1859 152.5 — — — — -167 +104 -182 52.5% +0.14 6–10 (38%) 4–7 (36%) 93.1 -7.11 1979 1780 155.2 — — — — -44 -74 +25 40.5% -0.50 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 -4.03
23 1978 1759 129.4 — — — — -92 +115 +15 52.9% +0.13 6–9 (40%) 6–4 (60%) 97.2 +1.55 1980 1742 138.8 — — — — -89 +32 +50 52.5% +0.26 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.5 -4.96
24 1979 1692 132.3 — — — — -101 +238 +54 45.5% -0.34 10–8 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.6 +2.45 1981 1720 143.5 — — — — -64 +96 — 43.1% -0.39 4–6 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 96.9 -2.78
25 1980 1679 128.6 — — — — -147 +207 +30 51.5% +0.20 4–7 (36%) 1–3 (25%) 95.3 -0.95 1982 1820 142.9 — — — — -77 +69 -9 55.2% +0.06 11–10 (52%) 9–10 (47%) 99.8 -3.53
26 1981 1680 123.2 — — — — -37 +172 -12 51.2% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 2–3 (40%) 100.4 +0.40 1983 1755 138.0 — — — — +7 +104 +97 55.4% +0.20 10–11 (48%) 7–3 (70%) 100.0 +1.14
27 1982 1692 123.3 — — — — -86 +88 -12 44.2% -0.42 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — -1.63 1984 1801 134.8 — — — — -65 -14 +95 53.1% +0.15 5–11 (31%) 7–8 (47%) 94.0 -0.64
28 1983 1597 97.2 — — — — — +86 — 21.1% -2.40 0–2 1–0 — +0.01 1985 1605 125.4 — — — — +10 +114 +210 37.7% -0.97 1–10 (9%) 0–1 — -0.99
29 1984 1580 98.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.09 1986 1565 105.1 — — — — +19 +86 +196 36.8% -0.87 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — 0.00
30 1985 1569 101.2 — — — — — +46 — 42.9% -0.43 0–1 — — +0.04 1987 1558 108.1 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.38 — — — -0.56
31 1986 1532 90.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.34 1988 1542 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.11
Career — 1946 138.0 — — — — -126 +121 -54 50.6% +0.03 69–57 (55%) 30–33 (48%) 100.5 -0.54 — 1892 141.9 — — — — -33 +33 +34 50.0% -0.05 55–80 (41%) 41–47 (47%) 93.1 -1.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.