H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rene Blount vs Hana Mandlikova H2H: 0-3
Hana Mandlikova holds a 3–0 lead over Rene Blount in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Hana Mandlikova leads 2–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Hana Mandlikova won the 1981 Seattle fourth round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 64
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 1981* | Seattle | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-2 | Rene Blount | Match data |
| Nov 15, 1980* | Amsterdam | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Hana Mandlikova | 6-4 6-2 | Rene Blount | Match data |
| Dec 1, 1979* | Melbourne | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Hana Mandlikova | 6-3 6-1 | Rene Blount | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rene Blount | #180 | #153 | 3 | 1,621 | 31 | 84 | 27.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Hana Mandlikova | #31 | #3 | 157 | 2,299 | 516 | 191 | 73.0% | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 25 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rene Blount | Hana Mandlikova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1975 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 7–11 | 38.9% | — | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 22–8 | 73.3% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 1 |
| 1979 | 4–18 | 18.2% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,985 | 0 | 5 |
| 1980 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 76–17 | 81.7% | — | 2,230 | 1 | 11 |
| 1981 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 56–24 | 70.0% | — | 2,108 | 2 | 14 |
| 1982 | 2–9 | 18.2% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 35–19 | 64.8% | — | 1,998 | 2 | 14 |
| 1983 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 44–21 | 67.7% | — | 1,977 | 2 | 14 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 47–11 | 81.0% | #3 | 2,081 | 2 | 19 |
| 1985 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 53–13 | 80.3% | #3 | 2,210 | 3 | 22 |
| 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #153 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 44–15 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,233 | 3 | 22 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,136 | 4 | 25 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 15–7 | 68.2% | #29 | 2,031 | 4 | 25 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #14 | 1,941 | 4 | 25 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #31 | 1,809 | 4 | 25 |