H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:32 UTC

Risa Ozaki vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-2

Venus Williams holds a 2–0 lead over Risa Ozaki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2017 Hong Kong third round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Risa Ozaki
JPN Age 32 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Venus Williams
USA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 12, 2017* Hong Kong WTA 250 R32 Hard Venus Williams #5 6-2 6-2 Risa Ozaki #95 Match data
Oct 13, 2016* Hong Kong WTA 250 R32 Hard Venus Williams #14 6-4 6-1 Risa Ozaki #117 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Risa Ozaki #1,109 #70 826 1,638 17 38 30.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Venus Williams #467 #1 7,452 2,362 768 288 72.7% 7 9 1 20 10 47

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Risa Ozaki Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,571 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,851 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1998 50–13 79.4% #5 2,094 0 2
19 2013 1–3 25.0% #193 1,479 0 0 1999 57–11 83.8% #3 2,258 0 8
20 2014 0–2 0.0% #155 1,453 0 0 2000 35–4 89.7% #3 2,321 2 13
21 2015 2–4 33.3% #160 1,462 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,338 4 19
22 2016 6–8 42.9% #97 1,517 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,297 4 26
23 2017 8–18 30.8% #118 1,463 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,257 4 27
24 2018 0–2 0.0% #289 1,433 0 0 2004 40–13 75.5% #9 2,072 4 29
25 2019 0–1 0.0% #313 1,416 0 0 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,085 5 31
26 — — — — — — — 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,007 5 31
27 — — — — — — — 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,048 6 34
28 — — — — — — — 2008 37–10 78.7% #6 2,133 7 37
29 — — — — — — — 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,981 7 39
30 — — — — — — — 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,057 7 41
31 — — — — — — — 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 1,994 7 41
32 — — — — — — — 2012 22–8 73.3% #24 2,007 7 42
33 — — — — — — — 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,889 7 42
34 — — — — — — — 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,874 7 43
35 — — — — — — — 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,957 7 46
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–14 63.2% #17 1,830 7 47
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,935 7 47
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,867 7 47
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,827 7 47
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,717 7 47
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,649 7 47
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,603 7 47
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,594 7 47