H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Roberta Vinci vs Ai Sugiyama H2H: 2-0
Roberta Vinci holds a 2–0 lead over Ai Sugiyama in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 6-2 2-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 51
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 2005* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Roberta Vinci | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2005* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Roberta Vinci | 2-6 6-3 6-2 | Ai Sugiyama | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Ai Sugiyama | #97 | #8 | 2,400 | 1,951 | 411 | 362 | 53.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberta Vinci | Ai Sugiyama | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #184 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #145 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #72 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #46 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–18 | 55.0% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 31–25 | 55.4% | #21 | 1,833 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #18 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #24 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #32 | 1,687 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #30 | 1,720 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #24 | 1,755 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #10 | 1,915 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #17 | 1,802 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 | 2005 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #29 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #26 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #38 | 1,632 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #31 | 1,742 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 | 2009 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #97 | 1,647 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |