H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Jarmila Wolfe H2H: 1-2

Jarmila Wolfe holds a 2–1 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Jarmila Wolfe leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2015 Indian Wells first round 4-6 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 2
3 main draw meetings
Jarmila Wolfe
AUS Age 39 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 2015* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R128 Hard Roberta Vinci #40 4-6 6-1 6-2 Jarmila Wolfe #48 Match data
Jan 3, 2013* Brisbane WTA 500 R32 Hard Jarmila Wolfe #183 4-6 6-1 6-3 Roberta Vinci #16 Match data
Jan 15, 2011* Hobart WTA 250 QF Hard Jarmila Wolfe #40 6-1 6-2 Roberta Vinci #39 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Jarmila Wolfe #623 #25 2,060 1,799 104 137 43.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Jarmila Wolfe
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 2003 2–1 66.7% #195 1,532 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 2004 0–1 0.0% #222 1,515 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 2005 2–2 50.0% #147 1,538 0 0
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 2006 8–12 40.0% #69 1,533 0 0
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2007 6–14 30.0% #142 1,475 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2008 3–6 33.3% #99 1,505 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2009 9–14 39.1% #110 1,562 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2010 19–12 61.3% #42 1,687 0 1
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2011 28–23 54.9% #33 1,696 0 2
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2012 7–19 26.9% #183 1,509 0 2
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2013 3–3 50.0% #238 1,535 0 2
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2014 6–10 37.5% #71 1,555 0 2
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2015 11–18 37.9% #105 1,537 0 2
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2016 0–2 0.0% #624 1,480 0 2
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 — — — — — — —