H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Jie Zheng H2H: 0-4

Jie Zheng holds a 4–0 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Jie Zheng leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jie Zheng won the 2014 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 4
4 main draw meetings
Jie Zheng
CHN Age 43 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 2014* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Jie Zheng #56 6-4 6-3 Roberta Vinci #12 Match data
Jun 16, 2012* Birmingham WTA 250 QF Grass Jie Zheng #32 6-3 5-7 6-4 Roberta Vinci #20 Match data
Jan 20, 2012* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Jie Zheng #38 6-4 6-2 Roberta Vinci #25 Match data
Aug 4, 2011* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Jie Zheng #83 6-4 6-2 Roberta Vinci #23 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Jie Zheng #961 #15 2,745 1,898 216 193 52.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Jie Zheng
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 2002 1–1 50.0% #185 1,507 0 0
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 2003 7–8 46.7% #84 1,535 0 0
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2004 10–17 37.0% #79 1,551 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2005 24–15 61.5% #44 1,705 0 1
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2006 25–16 61.0% #33 1,778 0 3
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2007 7–10 41.2% #163 1,689 0 3
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2008 20–10 66.7% #25 1,838 0 3
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2009 27–21 56.2% #35 1,779 0 3
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2010 23–18 56.1% #26 1,760 0 3
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2011 18–23 43.9% #48 1,705 0 3
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2012 25–23 52.1% #26 1,658 0 4
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2013 17–17 50.0% #53 1,688 0 4
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2014 12–13 48.0% #91 1,670 0 4
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2015 0–1 0.0% #962 1,648 0 4
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 — — — — — — —