H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Julia Schruff H2H: 1-0

Roberta Vinci holds a 1–0 lead over Julia Schruff in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberta Vinci leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2004 Palermo round of 32 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Julia Schruff
GER Age 44 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberta Vinci #106 6-3 6-3 Julia Schruff #144 Match data Jul 22, 2004* R32 Palermo Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,921 320 290 52.5% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Julia Schruff #1,200 #52 536 1,663 48 80 37.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Julia Schruff
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,502 0 0 2003 4–5 44.4% #117 1,508 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2004 5–12 29.4% #108 1,480 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,622 0 0 2005 9–13 40.9% #81 1,565 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,575 0 0 2006 18–24 42.9% #82 1,503 0 0
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2007 6–13 31.6% #119 1,463 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,584 0 1 2008 5–7 41.7% #132 1,483 0 0
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,664 0 2 2009 1–4 20.0% #131 1,473 0 0
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,818 0 3 2010 0–2 0.0% #173 1,451 0 0
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,775 0 6 — — — — — — —
29 2012 44–28 61.1% #16 1,831 0 7 — — — — — — —
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,850 0 9 — — — — — — —
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,751 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2016 28–24 53.8% #18 1,719 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,608 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,627 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberta Vinci Julia Schruff
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2003 — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2004 3 5 8 37.5% 2 7 9 22.2% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2005 6 7 13 46.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
23 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2006 11 14 25 44.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
24 2007 1 7 8 12.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 1 5 6 16.7% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
26 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 18 11 29 62.1% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 15 6 21 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 25 14 39 64.1% 10 9 19 52.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 25 15 40 62.5% 16 5 21 76.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 22 16 38 57.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 23 17 40 57.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 170 345 50.7% 101 83 184 54.9% 38 31 69 55.1% 6 6 12 50.0% — 24 38 62 38.7% 24 36 60 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 479/595 of Roberta Vinci's and 58/128 of Julia Schruff's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberta Vinci Julia Schruff
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 1/9 0.0 0.0 82.0% 47.6% 66.7% 57.1% 36.4% 51.0% 43.8%
21 2004 2/12 3.5 6.0 54.0% 52.5% 34.2% 54.2% 26.1% 44.0% 39.1% 2004 3/17 7.7 3.3 59.0% 61.3% 45.7% 48.0% 59.7% 55.0% 45.7%
22 2005 5/32 2.2 4.6 59.5% 57.8% 40.8% 62.1% 38.8% 51.1% 37.0% 2005 6/22 1.0 3.3 58.1% 62.4% 41.7% 49.1% 41.1% 53.8% 40.8%
23 2006 13/26 2.2 3.1 60.3% 61.8% 40.9% 56.5% 39.7% 53.1% 40.8% 2006 19/42 0.9 1.4 63.1% 58.9% 40.7% 50.4% 44.7% 52.3% 42.4%
24 2007 21/28 1.6 2.9 61.9% 60.3% 46.9% 51.2% 40.7% 55.0% 42.2% 2007 14/19 0.8 3.1 63.8% 54.2% 49.1% 50.8% 53.8% 51.9% 47.6%
25 2008 10/11 1.1 3.1 62.3% 60.5% 45.6% 45.6% 59.7% 55.0% 47.1% 2008 9/12 0.7 3.0 61.8% 54.4% 37.0% 51.3% 44.7% 47.5% 46.0%
26 2009 42/46 1.5 2.5 59.1% 62.6% 45.3% 54.1% 48.2% 55.6% 44.7% 2009 4/5 1.3 5.3 62.1% 50.2% 42.1% 50.5% 54.6% 47.2% 46.2%
27 2010 46/48 2.3 1.7 59.1% 60.5% 49.2% 52.3% 44.8% 55.7% 42.0% 2010 2/2 2.5 1.0 47.2% 52.9% 47.1% 52.3% 63.6% 50.2% 31.5%
28 2011 55/61 1.9 2.2 57.4% 65.2% 47.8% 53.6% 49.9% 57.7% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 64/72 3.0 2.3 56.2% 66.8% 48.5% 56.0% 53.1% 58.7% 46.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 62/69 3.0 2.0 59.0% 64.8% 47.7% 57.7% 46.3% 57.9% 46.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 41/47 2.6 2.9 53.1% 65.0% 46.7% 55.4% 50.4% 56.4% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 39/57 2.4 1.6 61.9% 63.8% 49.1% 50.3% 50.0% 57.9% 43.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 48/52 2.3 1.7 60.6% 63.9% 45.9% 53.4% 46.3% 56.7% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 27/30 2.0 1.8 61.2% 60.7% 44.8% 48.6% 41.5% 54.7% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 4/4 2.5 1.3 62.7% 59.7% 43.1% 65.0% 67.6% 53.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 479/610 2.3 2.2 58.7% 63.6% 47.0% 54.0% 47.9% 56.7% 44.1% — 58/128 1.3 2.6 62.0% 56.6% 43.3% 50.6% 48.5% 51.3% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberta Vinci Julia Schruff
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2001 1485 96.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 0–1 — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1478 99.9 — — — — +62 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1503 103.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 1–0 — -0.18 2003 1508 104.6 -0.91 +0.18 0.894 47.6% — +36 — 45.0% -0.55 1–1 — — +0.22
21 2004 1508 106.2 -1.92 -0.61 0.697 41.7% -7 -34 +121 39.3% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.44 2004 1481 105.8 -1.07 -0.37 1.014 50.2% +22 -10 — 36.8% -0.66 2–4 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 96.6 +0.61
22 2005 1622 124.1 -1.45 -2.43 0.757 44.7% -68 -125 +118 50.0% -0.27 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 104.0 -0.41 2005 1565 123.7 -0.34 -1.39 0.882 47.3% -9 -69 — 40.0% -0.76 4–2 (67%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.91
23 2006 1576 114.9 -1.68 -1.84 0.869 47.1% -32 -53 — 40.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.35 2006 1503 111.2 -2.40 -2.02 0.888 47.4% +31 +40 -7 41.7% -0.83 5–1 (83%) 4–1 (80%) 108.3 +1.04
24 2007 1561 120.8 -0.41 -1.67 0.937 48.4% -41 +8 +148 42.2% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 96.1 -0.85 2007 1464 106.2 -2.66 +0.61 0.991 49.5% +24 +54 — 41.7% -0.58 2–8 (20%) 2–1 (67%) 94.5 +0.16
25 2008 1585 114.9 +0.77 +1.74 1.048 51.2% -57 -7 — 45.8% -0.08 1–1 — — -0.36 2008 1484 103.8 -4.12 -0.06 0.877 47.1% +9 +29 — 48.0% -0.24 1–2 (33%) 4–1 (80%) 100.6 +0.59
26 2009 1665 136.6 +0.16 +1.03 1.008 50.1% -103 +34 +76 49.0% +0.10 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.7 -2.09 2009 1474 99.8 -1.61 -1.47 0.875 46.4% +20 — — 18.2% -2.18 1–0 0–1 — -0.10
27 2010 1819 134.7 +0.73 -1.12 0.948 48.9% -39 -121 -80 54.6% -0.03 9–3 (75%) 9–3 (75%) 111.5 -2.49 2010 1451 99.0 -3.11 -3.04 0.632 41.0% — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 — — +0.07
28 2011 1775 135.8 +1.59 +0.80 1.056 51.2% -60 +21 +63 59.0% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 103.9 -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 1832 144.5 +2.94 +2.39 1.122 52.5% +13 -119 +16 57.9% +0.71 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 102.8 -0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2013 1851 142.8 +2.57 +2.61 1.105 52.1% -29 +17 +6 60.2% +0.67 18–9 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.7 +2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2014 1713 131.6 +0.37 +0.72 1.024 50.4% -31 +121 — 46.2% -0.03 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 90.3 +0.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2015 1751 136.1 -0.58 +2.38 1.042 51.0% +8 -27 -60 54.2% +0.18 10–13 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.9 +1.44 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2016 1719 138.5 +0.67 +0.43 0.992 49.9% +36 -63 -24 52.1% +0.05 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 +2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1608 128.5 -1.05 -1.18 0.901 47.8% +12 +33 +88 36.2% -0.86 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1628 117.8 -2.45 -0.08 0.852 47.1% +51 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 138.3 +0.89 +0.85 1.018 50.4% -19 -18 +49 51.4% +0.08 99–85 (54%) 67–61 (52%) 103.3 +0.02 — 1664 112.6 -2.39 -0.89 0.906 47.7% +18 +18 -7 40.2% -0.76 16–19 (46%) 12–10 (55%) 101.6 +1.32

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.