H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Lilia Osterloh H2H: 1-0

Roberta Vinci holds a 1–0 lead over Lilia Osterloh in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Roberta Vinci leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2009 Birmingham round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Lilia Osterloh
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberta Vinci #54 6-4 6-2 Lilia Osterloh #220 Match data Jun 11, 2009* R32 Birmingham International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,921 320 290 52.5% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Lilia Osterloh #1,223 #41 738 1,696 83 138 37.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Lilia Osterloh
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 1996 1–1 50.0% #195 1,518 0 0
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 1997 2–2 50.0% #170 1,550 0 0
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,502 0 0 1998 0–5 0.0% #120 1,501 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 1999 9–13 40.9% #79 1,545 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,622 0 0 2000 15–19 44.1% #43 1,596 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,575 0 0 2001 23–25 47.9% #53 1,658 0 0
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2002 7–18 28.0% #156 1,535 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,584 0 1 2003 0–2 0.0% #180 1,508 0 0
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,664 0 2 2004 4–5 44.4% #119 1,561 0 0
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,818 0 3 2005 2–9 18.2% #144 1,488 0 0
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,775 0 6 2006 6–8 42.9% #118 1,509 0 0
29 2012 44–28 61.1% #16 1,831 0 7 2007 7–12 36.8% #91 1,544 0 0
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,850 0 9 2008 3–10 23.1% #230 1,486 0 0
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2009 3–3 50.0% #136 1,510 0 0
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,751 0 9 2010 1–6 14.3% #237 1,467 0 0
33 2016 28–24 53.8% #18 1,719 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,608 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,627 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberta Vinci Lilia Osterloh
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1998 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1999 6 8 14 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2000 6 9 15 40.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 14 13 27 51.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
24 2007 1 7 8 12.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2002 6 8 14 42.9% 0 7 7 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2003 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2004 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 18 11 29 62.1% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 15 6 21 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2006 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 2012 25 14 39 64.1% 10 9 19 52.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2013 25 15 40 62.5% 16 5 21 76.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 3 5 8 37.5% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2014 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2009 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
32 2015 22 16 38 57.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
33 2016 23 17 40 57.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 170 345 50.7% 101 83 184 54.9% 38 31 69 55.1% 6 6 12 50.0% — 56 76 132 42.4% 11 34 45 24.4% 11 18 29 37.9% 5 10 15 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 479/595 of Roberta Vinci's and 52/70 of Lilia Osterloh's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberta Vinci Lilia Osterloh
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2004 2/12 3.5 6.0 54.0% 52.5% 34.2% 54.2% 26.1% 44.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5/32 2.2 4.6 59.5% 57.8% 40.8% 62.1% 38.8% 51.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 13/26 2.2 3.1 60.3% 61.8% 40.9% 56.5% 39.7% 53.1% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 21/28 1.6 2.9 61.9% 60.3% 46.9% 51.2% 40.7% 55.0% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 10/11 1.1 3.1 62.3% 60.5% 45.6% 45.6% 59.7% 55.0% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 42/46 1.5 2.5 59.1% 62.6% 45.3% 54.1% 48.2% 55.6% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2010 46/48 2.3 1.7 59.1% 60.5% 49.2% 52.3% 44.8% 55.7% 42.0% 2005 3/11 0.3 4.3 60.5% 46.3% 46.2% 38.9% 66.7% 46.9% 37.3%
28 2011 55/61 1.9 2.2 57.4% 65.2% 47.8% 53.6% 49.9% 57.7% 44.6% 2006 7/14 0.9 3.6 66.1% 56.0% 39.1% 42.7% 47.9% 49.6% 46.1%
29 2012 64/72 3.0 2.3 56.2% 66.8% 48.5% 56.0% 53.1% 58.7% 46.3% 2007 17/19 1.8 3.6 60.1% 54.8% 45.0% 46.6% 44.5% 50.6% 43.6%
30 2013 62/69 3.0 2.0 59.0% 64.8% 47.7% 57.7% 46.3% 57.9% 46.5% 2008 12/13 1.3 4.6 58.3% 60.2% 37.4% 55.9% 42.2% 50.7% 42.9%
31 2014 41/47 2.6 2.9 53.1% 65.0% 46.7% 55.4% 50.4% 56.4% 44.7% 2009 6/6 2.2 2.7 62.8% 60.1% 48.3% 55.1% 59.7% 56.1% 39.6%
32 2015 39/57 2.4 1.6 61.9% 63.8% 49.1% 50.3% 50.0% 57.9% 43.9% 2010 7/7 2.9 3.0 61.3% 57.0% 39.1% 47.3% 54.5% 50.0% 37.0%
33 2016 48/52 2.3 1.7 60.6% 63.9% 45.9% 53.4% 46.3% 56.7% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 27/30 2.0 1.8 61.2% 60.7% 44.8% 48.6% 41.5% 54.7% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 4/4 2.5 1.3 62.7% 59.7% 43.1% 65.0% 67.6% 53.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 479/610 2.3 2.2 58.7% 63.6% 47.0% 54.0% 47.9% 56.7% 44.1% — 52/221 1.7 3.7 61.0% 56.6% 42.1% 48.9% 48.8% 50.8% 42.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberta Vinci Lilia Osterloh
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2001 1485 96.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 0–1 — +0.48 1996 1519 110.9 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — — — -0.06
19 2002 1478 99.9 — — — — +62 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.60 1997 1551 112.0 — — — — +33 — — 28.6% -2.00 1–0 — — +0.04
20 2003 1503 103.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 1–0 — -0.18 1998 1502 105.3 — — — — +38 — — 23.1% -1.85 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — +0.07
21 2004 1508 106.2 -1.92 -0.61 0.697 41.7% -7 -34 +121 39.3% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.44 1999 1546 126.1 — — — — +29 +17 +5 40.0% -0.98 4–2 (67%) — — -0.06
22 2005 1622 124.1 -1.45 -2.43 0.757 44.7% -68 -125 +118 50.0% -0.27 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 104.0 -0.41 2000 1596 120.7 — — — — -34 -49 +61 42.5% -0.41 8–6 (57%) 3–8 (27%) 101.9 -0.05
23 2006 1576 114.9 -1.68 -1.84 0.869 47.1% -32 -53 — 40.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.35 2001 1658 133.0 — — — — -4 -132 +27 49.5% -0.09 5–8 (38%) 7–4 (64%) 100.9 -0.27
24 2007 1561 120.8 -0.41 -1.67 0.937 48.4% -41 +8 +148 42.2% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 96.1 -0.85 2002 1535 110.8 — — — — +102 -112 +96 29.3% -1.59 5–3 (63%) 2–3 (40%) 102.7 -1.31
25 2008 1585 114.9 +0.77 +1.74 1.048 51.2% -57 -7 — 45.8% -0.08 1–1 — — -0.36 2003 1509 94.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.04
26 2009 1665 136.6 +0.16 +1.03 1.008 50.1% -103 +34 +76 49.0% +0.10 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.7 -2.09 2004 1561 130.0 — — — — +95 — — 47.6% -0.38 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -0.58
27 2010 1819 134.7 +0.73 -1.12 0.948 48.9% -39 -121 -80 54.6% -0.03 9–3 (75%) 9–3 (75%) 111.5 -2.49 2005 1488 99.5 -2.44 -2.36 0.703 41.7% +105 -60 — 28.0% -2.08 0–3 (0%) 0–1 — -0.27
28 2011 1775 135.8 +1.59 +0.80 1.056 51.2% -60 +21 +63 59.0% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 103.9 -0.43 2006 1510 110.3 -2.68 -0.13 0.914 47.9% +82 — — 46.9% -0.19 3–3 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 98.8 +0.94
29 2012 1832 144.5 +2.94 +2.39 1.122 52.5% +13 -119 +16 57.9% +0.71 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 102.8 -0.15 2007 1545 117.7 -3.39 +0.08 0.882 46.8% +27 — — 41.9% -0.91 1–4 (20%) 1–0 — -0.55
30 2013 1851 142.8 +2.57 +2.61 1.105 52.1% -29 +17 +6 60.2% +0.67 18–9 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.7 +2.38 2008 1486 100.1 -3.07 -1.01 0.871 46.7% +64 -97 — 24.0% -1.44 1–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.06
31 2014 1713 131.6 +0.37 +0.72 1.024 50.4% -31 +121 — 46.2% -0.03 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 90.3 +0.40 2009 1511 100.3 -0.43 -1.46 0.901 48.5% +43 — — 40.0% -0.40 3–0 (100%) 0–1 — +0.33
32 2015 1751 136.1 -0.58 +2.38 1.042 51.0% +8 -27 -60 54.2% +0.18 10–13 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.9 +1.44 2010 1468 100.5 -2.57 -3.96 0.740 43.5% +60 — — 18.8% -2.19 1–1 0–1 — -0.29
33 2016 1719 138.5 +0.67 +0.43 0.992 49.9% +36 -63 -24 52.1% +0.05 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 +2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1608 128.5 -1.05 -1.18 0.901 47.8% +12 +33 +88 36.2% -0.86 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1628 117.8 -2.45 -0.08 0.852 47.1% +51 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 138.3 +0.89 +0.85 1.018 50.4% -19 -18 +49 51.4% +0.08 99–85 (54%) 67–61 (52%) 103.3 +0.02 — 1696 123.9 -2.71 -1.06 0.855 46.4% +34 -80 +48 39.2% -0.82 33–35 (49%) 16–27 (37%) 99.8 -0.89

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.