H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Lourdes Domínguez Lino H2H: 2-1

Roberta Vinci holds a 2–1 lead over Lourdes Domínguez Lino in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–0 on clay, while Lourdes Domínguez Lino leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2013 Palermo quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Lourdes Domínguez Lino
ESP Age 45 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 13, 2013* Palermo WTA 250 QF Clay Roberta Vinci #11 6-1 6-4 Lourdes Domínguez Lino #58 Match data
Oct 3, 2012* Beijing WTA 1000 R64 Hard Lourdes Domínguez Lino #64 6-7(4) 7-6(4) 6-2 Roberta Vinci #16 Match data
Jul 16, 2009* Palermo WTA 250 R32 Clay Roberta Vinci #46 4-6 6-4 7-6(3) Lourdes Domínguez Lino #83 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Lourdes Domínguez Lino #1,129 #40 1,305 1,674 125 157 44.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Lourdes Domínguez Lino
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #141 1,489 0 0
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2001 0–1 0.0% #378 1,479 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2002 4–3 57.1% #390 1,518 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2003 0–1 0.0% #319 1,503 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2004 1–1 50.0% #208 1,508 0 0
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2005 6–4 60.0% #72 1,553 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2006 21–19 52.5% #52 1,622 0 1
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2007 16–21 43.2% #71 1,558 0 1
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2008 6–11 35.3% #91 1,521 0 1
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2009 6–13 31.6% #134 1,484 0 1
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2010 2–4 33.3% #85 1,493 0 1
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2011 16–16 50.0% #79 1,583 0 2
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2012 16–16 50.0% #48 1,653 0 2
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 2013 17–22 43.6% #69 1,620 0 2
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 2014 7–11 38.9% #110 1,570 0 2
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 2015 4–5 44.4% #100 1,552 0 2
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 2016 3–8 27.3% #220 1,517 0 2