H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Meilen Tu H2H: 0-3

Meilen Tu holds a 3–0 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2007 Forest Hills fourth round 4-6 6-2 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Meilen Tu
USA Age 48 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 24, 2007* Forest Hills WTA 250 R16 Hard Meilen Tu #46 4-6 6-2 6-0 Roberta Vinci #49 Match data
Jun 13, 2007* Birmingham WTA 500 R64 Grass Meilen Tu #35 6-1 6-2 Roberta Vinci #52 Match data
May 16, 2007* Rome WTA 1000 R64 Clay Meilen Tu #45 2-6 6-2 6-4 Roberta Vinci #52 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Meilen Tu #1,136 #35 769 1,692 103 163 38.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Meilen Tu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1994 2–3 40.0% #160 1,542 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1995 3–10 23.1% #161 1,506 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 1996 2–3 40.0% #157 1,518 0 0
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 1997 6–13 31.6% #81 1,519 0 0
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 1998 2–3 40.0% #209 1,533 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 1999 3–11 21.4% #103 1,485 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 2000 6–9 40.0% #67 1,576 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2001 25–23 52.1% #45 1,615 0 1
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2002 16–24 40.0% #73 1,561 0 1
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2003 4–14 22.2% #143 1,478 0 1
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2004 2–4 33.3% #162 1,464 0 1
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2005 4–9 30.8% #120 1,474 0 1
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2006 7–9 43.8% #90 1,532 0 1
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2007 20–22 47.6% #47 1,625 0 1
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2008 1–6 14.3% #630 1,546 0 1
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 — — — — — — —
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 — — — — — — —
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 — — — — — — —