H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Mirjana Lucic-Baroni H2H: 2-1

Roberta Vinci holds a 2–1 lead over Mirjana Lucic-Baroni in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Roberta Vinci leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2015 Toronto third round 6-3 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
CRO Age 44 Right-Handed 181 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 13, 2015* Toronto WTA 1000 R32 Hard Roberta Vinci #53 6-3 6-3 Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #51 Match data
Jul 1, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Roberta Vinci #23 7-6(4) 7-6(3) Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #129 Match data
Jun 9, 2011* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #94 6-7(2) 7-6(4) 7-5 Roberta Vinci #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Mirjana Lucic-Baroni #424 #20 1,924 1,798 136 166 45.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Mirjana Lucic-Baroni
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 11–3 78.6% #49 1,692 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1998 15–11 57.7% #51 1,776 0 2
17 — — — — — — — 1999 11–13 45.8% #48 1,757 0 2
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 2000 2–12 14.3% #202 1,601 0 2
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 2001 2–3 40.0% #192 1,596 0 2
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 2002 1–6 14.3% #203 1,546 0 2
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #348 1,526 0 2
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2007 1–1 50.0% #455 1,538 0 2
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 — — — — — — —
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2009 0–1 0.0% #258 1,519 0 2
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2010 5–6 45.5% #96 1,554 0 2
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2011 8–14 36.4% #129 1,551 0 2
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2012 7–12 36.8% #105 1,535 0 2
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2013 8–11 42.1% #110 1,563 0 2
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 2014 12–8 60.0% #60 1,706 0 3
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 2015 17–26 39.5% #68 1,657 0 3
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 2016 14–18 43.8% #80 1,629 0 3
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 2017 20–16 55.6% #32 1,698 0 3
36 — — — — — — — 2018 2–3 40.0% #327 1,689 0 3