H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Patty Schnyder H2H: 1-3

Patty Schnyder holds a 3–1 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Patty Schnyder leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Patty Schnyder won the 2007 Wimbledon second round 2-6 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Patty Schnyder
SUI Age 47 Left-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Patty Schnyder #15 2-6 6-3 6-2 Roberta Vinci #49 Match data Jun 28, 2007* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Patty Schnyder #19 6-0 7-5 Roberta Vinci #50 Match data May 9, 2007* R64 Berlin Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Roberta Vinci #57 7-6(2) 5-7 6-4 Patty Schnyder #10 Match data Sep 30, 2005* R16 Luxembourg Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Patty Schnyder #16 7-6(3) 6-0 Roberta Vinci #100 Match data Sep 1, 2004* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberta Vinci — #7 3,615 1,921 320 291 52.4% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Patty Schnyder — #7 3,050 1,994 495 349 58.6% 0 1 0 1 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Patty Schnyder
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 1–1 50.0% #143 1,526 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1996 7–10 41.2% #64 1,586 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 1997 21–24 46.7% #26 1,709 0 0
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 1998 51–19 72.9% #11 1,911 0 5
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,502 0 0 1999 29–23 55.8% #21 1,793 0 6
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2000 31–25 55.4% #25 1,751 0 6
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,622 0 0 2001 24–24 50.0% #37 1,734 0 7
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,575 0 0 2002 34–24 58.6% #15 1,848 0 8
24 2007 11–18 37.9% #73 1,571 0 1 2003 28–23 54.9% #23 1,809 0 8
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,592 0 1 2004 33–23 58.9% #14 1,808 0 8
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,665 0 2 2005 58–25 69.9% #7 1,932 0 10
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,819 0 3 2006 47–25 65.3% #9 1,889 0 10
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,775 0 6 2007 45–26 63.4% #16 1,885 0 10
29 2012 44–28 61.1% #16 1,832 0 7 2008 34–22 60.7% #14 1,821 0 11
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,850 0 9 2009 21–22 48.8% #42 1,754 0 11
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2010 26–19 57.8% #44 1,799 0 11
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,751 0 9 2011 3–9 25.0% — 1,668 0 11
33 2016 28–24 53.8% #18 1,719 0 10 — — — — — — —
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,608 0 10 — — — — — — —
35 2018 1–3 25.0% — 1,627 0 10 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2016 0–1 0.0% #324 1,632 0 11
38 — — — — — — — 2017 1–1 50.0% #148 1,628 0 11
39 — — — — — — — 2018 1–3 25.0% #278 1,597 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberta Vinci Patty Schnyder
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 2 2 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 9 9 18 50.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
19 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1998 17 9 26 65.4% 27 6 33 81.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
20 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1999 16 10 26 61.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2000 15 11 26 57.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
22 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 11 10 21 52.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 3 2 5 60.0%
24 2007 1 8 9 11.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 14 9 23 60.9% 10 9 19 52.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0%
25 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2004 18 12 30 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2005 42 17 59 71.2% 15 6 21 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 2010 18 11 29 62.1% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2006 30 15 45 66.7% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
28 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 15 6 21 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2007 30 18 48 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2012 25 14 39 64.1% 10 9 19 52.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2008 25 16 41 61.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2013 25 15 40 62.5% 16 5 21 76.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2009 8 12 20 40.0% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2014 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 11 9 20 55.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2015 22 16 38 57.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2011 3 4 7 42.9% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2016 23 17 40 57.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 171 346 50.6% 101 83 184 54.9% 38 31 69 55.1% 6 6 12 50.0% — 264 175 439 60.1% 188 120 308 61.0% 15 21 36 41.7% 28 33 61 45.9%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 479/596 of Roberta Vinci's and 311/496 of Patty Schnyder's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberta Vinci Patty Schnyder
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2004 2/12 3.5 6.0 54.0% 52.5% 34.2% 54.2% 26.1% 44.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5/32 2.2 4.6 59.5% 57.8% 40.8% 62.1% 38.8% 51.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 13/26 2.2 3.1 60.3% 61.8% 40.9% 56.5% 39.7% 53.1% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 21/29 1.6 2.9 61.9% 60.3% 46.9% 51.2% 40.7% 55.0% 42.2% 2003 7/51 2.3 1.3 62.4% 65.7% 61.0% 60.5% 42.0% 63.0% 42.9%
25 2008 10/11 1.1 3.1 62.3% 60.5% 45.6% 45.6% 59.7% 55.0% 47.1% 2004 12/56 3.3 3.0 61.5% 66.1% 51.6% 45.1% 45.4% 60.7% 45.6%
26 2009 42/46 1.5 2.5 59.1% 62.6% 45.3% 54.1% 48.2% 55.6% 44.7% 2005 20/83 3.7 2.4 60.5% 64.6% 49.7% 59.6% 51.8% 58.6% 45.3%
27 2010 46/48 2.3 1.7 59.1% 60.5% 49.2% 52.3% 44.8% 55.7% 42.0% 2006 50/72 3.8 2.2 63.4% 65.7% 51.4% 61.6% 49.7% 60.3% 45.6%
28 2011 55/61 1.9 2.2 57.4% 65.2% 47.8% 53.6% 49.9% 57.7% 44.6% 2007 66/71 3.2 2.3 65.5% 66.1% 52.0% 58.4% 49.6% 61.1% 45.3%
29 2012 64/72 3.0 2.3 56.2% 66.8% 48.5% 56.0% 53.1% 58.7% 46.3% 2008 51/56 2.6 2.4 63.7% 64.1% 50.4% 55.4% 43.9% 59.2% 44.8%
30 2013 62/69 3.0 2.0 59.0% 64.8% 47.7% 57.7% 46.3% 57.9% 46.5% 2009 42/43 2.5 2.5 61.8% 61.6% 51.0% 56.5% 52.6% 57.4% 42.2%
31 2014 41/47 2.6 2.9 53.1% 65.0% 46.7% 55.4% 50.4% 56.4% 44.7% 2010 44/45 2.2 2.3 63.9% 60.2% 47.9% 54.6% 45.7% 55.7% 43.1%
32 2015 39/57 2.4 1.6 61.9% 63.8% 49.1% 50.3% 50.0% 57.9% 43.9% 2011 12/12 1.8 2.6 61.5% 55.2% 44.6% 47.4% 46.7% 51.2% 37.7%
33 2016 48/52 2.3 1.7 60.6% 63.9% 45.9% 53.4% 46.3% 56.7% 43.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 27/30 2.0 1.8 61.2% 60.7% 44.8% 48.6% 41.5% 54.7% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 4/4 2.5 1.3 62.7% 59.7% 43.1% 65.0% 67.6% 53.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 1/1 1.0 3.0 58.2% 54.7% 41.3% 66.7% 57.1% 49.1% 52.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 2/2 3.5 3.5 64.6% 64.7% 55.9% 67.9% 30.6% 61.7% 39.6%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 4/4 1.0 2.3 66.7% 59.9% 44.0% 41.5% 33.6% 54.4% 39.3%
Career — 479/611 2.3 2.2 58.7% 63.6% 47.0% 54.0% 47.9% 56.7% 44.1% — 311/844 2.9 2.4 63.4% 63.6% 50.6% 56.6% 47.9% 58.7% 44.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberta Vinci Patty Schnyder
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1527 112.0 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.40 1–0 — — -0.07
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1586 120.2 — — — — -33 +52 — 40.5% -0.76 5–3 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 105.4 -0.06
18 2001 1485 96.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 0–1 — +0.48 1997 1710 151.6 — — — — -46 +9 — 50.0% +0.26 1–11 (8%) 4–5 (44%) 90.4 -0.80
19 2002 1478 99.9 — — — — +62 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.60 1998 1912 159.5 — — — — -71 +102 — 67.3% +1.24 15–11 (58%) 10–5 (67%) 109.8 -0.07
20 2003 1503 103.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 1–0 — -0.18 1999 1794 148.8 — — — — +33 +78 — 54.3% -0.08 13–12 (52%) 8–1 (89%) 102.0 -0.17
21 2004 1508 106.2 -1.92 -0.61 0.697 41.7% -7 -34 +121 39.3% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.44 2000 1751 142.6 — — — — +23 +53 -184 53.4% +0.31 11–8 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 103.8 -1.05
22 2005 1622 124.1 -1.45 -2.43 0.757 44.7% -68 -125 +118 50.0% -0.27 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 104.0 -0.41 2001 1735 129.7 — — — — -25 +32 -131 53.1% -0.08 7–14 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.1 +0.22
23 2006 1576 114.9 -1.68 -1.84 0.869 47.1% -32 -53 — 40.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.35 2002 1848 146.2 — — — — -30 -40 -257 53.7% +0.32 15–7 (68%) 10–5 (67%) 109.0 -1.16
24 2007 1572 124.0 -0.34 -1.48 0.937 48.4% -25 -2 +138 40.9% -0.64 3–7 (30%) 2–3 (40%) 95.2 -1.28 2003 1810 143.5 +3.50 +0.33 1.160 53.0% +28 -43 — 51.4% +0.06 7–4 (64%) 5–5 (50%) 100.7 +0.37
25 2008 1592 115.0 +0.77 +1.74 1.048 51.2% -41 -14 — 45.8% -0.08 1–1 — — -0.39 2004 1809 142.7 +3.52 +0.81 1.159 52.9% +2 +9 -222 59.7% +0.61 12–8 (60%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 +1.41
26 2009 1666 136.5 +0.16 +1.03 1.008 50.1% -93 +33 +75 49.0% +0.10 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.5 -2.10 2005 1932 158.1 +2.86 +1.20 1.093 51.8% -18 +31 — 66.2% +1.20 19–17 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 99.0 +3.23
27 2010 1820 134.7 +0.73 -1.12 0.948 48.9% -37 -121 -81 54.6% -0.03 9–3 (75%) 9–3 (75%) 111.3 -2.48 2006 1890 156.1 +3.89 +1.47 1.148 53.0% +35 +25 — 62.8% +0.85 10–8 (56%) 12–7 (63%) 102.4 +1.42
28 2011 1776 135.9 +1.59 +0.80 1.056 51.2% -58 +20 +63 59.0% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 103.9 -0.44 2007 1886 151.5 +4.70 +1.91 1.163 53.3% -17 +90 -215 61.6% +1.02 13–13 (50%) 4–7 (36%) 94.4 +2.23
29 2012 1832 144.6 +2.94 +2.39 1.122 52.5% +13 -119 +16 57.9% +0.71 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 102.8 -0.15 2008 1821 141.6 +3.54 +0.46 1.097 51.8% -3 +98 — 57.7% +0.47 11–9 (55%) 10–3 (77%) 102.4 +2.47
30 2013 1851 142.9 +2.57 +2.61 1.105 52.1% -29 +18 +7 60.2% +0.67 18–9 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.7 +2.38 2009 1754 137.5 +1.61 -0.95 0.991 49.8% -10 +115 — 49.0% -0.07 7–5 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 103.6 -1.37
31 2014 1713 131.6 +0.37 +0.72 1.024 50.4% -31 +121 — 46.2% -0.03 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 90.3 +0.40 2010 1799 133.6 -0.01 -0.10 0.972 49.4% -35 +64 — 51.0% +0.09 12–2 (86%) 3–8 (27%) 104.3 -1.95
32 2015 1751 136.1 -0.58 +2.38 1.042 51.0% +9 -27 -60 54.2% +0.18 10–13 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.9 +1.44 2011 1669 112.9 -2.14 -2.61 0.773 44.9% +66 +62 — 27.6% -1.34 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.02
33 2016 1719 138.5 +0.67 +0.43 0.992 49.9% +36 -62 -24 52.1% +0.05 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 +2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2017 1608 128.5 -1.05 -1.18 0.901 47.8% +12 +33 +88 36.2% -0.86 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1628 117.8 -2.45 -0.08 0.852 47.1% +52 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1632 99.5 -0.77 +0.04 1.027 50.7% — — — 33.3% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.10
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1628 107.6 -0.85 -0.91 1.035 50.3% — — — 50.0% +0.34 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.25
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1598 111.4 -1.17 -1.12 0.861 46.5% — +29 — 22.2% -1.22 1–0 0–1 — -0.22
Career — 1921 138.4 +0.90 +0.86 1.018 50.4% -17 -19 +48 51.4% +0.07 99–85 (54%) 67–62 (52%) 102.9 -0.06 — 1994 151.9 +2.71 +0.57 1.069 51.4% -7 +45 -201 56.6% +0.46 164–136 (55%) 110–75 (59%) 105.6 +0.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.