H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 0-2

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 2–0 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2005 Birmingham second round 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 8, 2005* Birmingham WTA 500 R64 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #64 6-1 6-2 Roberta Vinci #97 Match data
Jun 12, 2003* Birmingham WTA 250 R32 Grass Tamarine Tanasugarn #36 6-4 6-2 Roberta Vinci #149 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,923 320 287 52.7% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,818 267 273 49.4% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,482 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,492 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,478 0 0
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,609 0 0
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,503 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,623 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,634 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,576 0 0 2000 30–18 62.5% #28 1,787 0 0
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,697 0 0
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,585 0 1 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,663 0 2 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,817 0 3 2004 19–24 44.2% #66 1,623 0 1
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,774 0 6 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,503 0 1
29 2012 44–27 62.0% #16 1,834 0 7 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,588 0 1
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,853 0 9 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,570 0 1
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2008 19–15 55.9% #37 1,702 0 2
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,765 0 9 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,653 0 3
33 2016 28–22 56.0% #18 1,733 0 10 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,734 0 4
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,610 0 10 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,649 0 4
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,628 0 10 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,594 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4