H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 2-2

Roberta Vinci and Tathiana Garbin are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–1 on clay, while Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2010 Budapest round of 32 7-5 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2 – 2
4 main-draw meetings
Tathiana Garbin
ITA Age 49 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Roberta Vinci #55 7-5 6-4 Tathiana Garbin #61 Match data Jul 8, 2010* R32 Budapest International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Roberta Vinci #64 6-7(4) 6-4 0-3 (ret.) Tathiana Garbin #29 Match data Feb 25, 2007* F Bogotá Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Tathiana Garbin #75 6-2 6-2 Roberta Vinci #87 Match data Jul 22, 2006* SF Palermo Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Tathiana Garbin #83 6-3 4-6 7-5 Roberta Vinci #169 Match data Feb 14, 2002* R32 Qatar Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,921 320 290 52.5% 0 0 0 1 9 10
Tathiana Garbin #86 #22 1,255 1,726 168 209 44.6% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Tathiana Garbin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,502 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 1998 1–4 20.0% #121 1,476 0 0
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,622 0 0 1999 5–9 35.7% #126 1,467 0 0
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,575 0 0 2000 23–20 53.5% #42 1,619 0 1
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2001 13–19 40.6% #91 1,575 0 1
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,584 0 1 2002 18–17 51.4% #71 1,600 0 1
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,664 0 2 2003 12–17 41.4% #82 1,556 0 1
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,818 0 3 2004 12–19 38.7% #58 1,547 0 1
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,775 0 6 2005 13–19 40.6% #85 1,559 0 1
29 2012 44–28 61.1% #16 1,831 0 7 2006 15–15 50.0% #38 1,627 0 1
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,850 0 9 2007 20–16 55.6% #36 1,658 0 1
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2008 14–20 41.2% #55 1,564 0 1
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,751 0 9 2009 13–16 44.8% #59 1,607 0 1
33 2016 28–24 53.8% #18 1,719 0 10 2010 9–17 34.6% #87 1,579 0 1
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,608 0 10 2011 0–1 0.0% #86 1,573 0 1
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,627 0 10 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberta Vinci Tathiana Garbin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 2 3 5 40.0% 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — — — — —
23 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2000 4 9 13 30.8% 19 9 28 67.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2007 1 7 8 12.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2001 6 7 13 46.2% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 7 8 15 46.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2010 18 11 29 62.1% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 8 13 21 38.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 15 6 21 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2005 6 12 18 33.3% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 2012 25 14 39 64.1% 10 9 19 52.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2006 7 8 15 46.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2013 25 15 40 62.5% 16 5 21 76.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 7 6 13 53.8% 12 7 19 63.2% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
31 2014 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2008 8 9 17 47.1% 5 8 13 38.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 2015 22 16 38 57.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2009 5 8 13 38.5% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
33 2016 23 17 40 57.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2010 3 7 10 30.0% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
34 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 175 170 345 50.7% 101 83 184 54.9% 38 31 69 55.1% 6 6 12 50.0% — 70 100 170 41.2% 92 90 182 50.5% 3 13 16 18.8% 3 6 9 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 479/595 of Roberta Vinci's and 128/248 of Tathiana Garbin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberta Vinci Tathiana Garbin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2004 2/12 3.5 6.0 54.0% 52.5% 34.2% 54.2% 26.1% 44.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5/32 2.2 4.6 59.5% 57.8% 40.8% 62.1% 38.8% 51.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 13/26 2.2 3.1 60.3% 61.8% 40.9% 56.5% 39.7% 53.1% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2007 21/28 1.6 2.9 61.9% 60.3% 46.9% 51.2% 40.7% 55.0% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2008 10/11 1.1 3.1 62.3% 60.5% 45.6% 45.6% 59.7% 55.0% 47.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2009 42/46 1.5 2.5 59.1% 62.6% 45.3% 54.1% 48.2% 55.6% 44.7% 2003 5/29 3.4 4.4 53.6% 65.0% 41.0% 38.8% 27.4% 54.0% 42.0%
27 2010 46/48 2.3 1.7 59.1% 60.5% 49.2% 52.3% 44.8% 55.7% 42.0% 2004 6/31 2.5 4.3 55.7% 66.8% 48.1% 48.7% 54.3% 58.8% 47.4%
28 2011 55/61 1.9 2.2 57.4% 65.2% 47.8% 53.6% 49.9% 57.7% 44.6% 2005 4/32 2.5 4.5 61.4% 59.3% 46.1% 56.8% 43.1% 54.3% 41.9%
29 2012 64/72 3.0 2.3 56.2% 66.8% 48.5% 56.0% 53.1% 58.7% 46.3% 2006 13/30 2.4 1.8 59.3% 57.9% 42.6% 47.5% 50.7% 51.9% 42.5%
30 2013 62/69 3.0 2.0 59.0% 64.8% 47.7% 57.7% 46.3% 57.9% 46.5% 2007 25/36 1.7 2.2 63.8% 59.2% 45.7% 47.8% 43.4% 54.4% 44.5%
31 2014 41/47 2.6 2.9 53.1% 65.0% 46.7% 55.4% 50.4% 56.4% 44.7% 2008 29/34 1.8 3.2 60.8% 59.0% 43.8% 47.8% 44.7% 52.8% 42.5%
32 2015 39/57 2.4 1.6 61.9% 63.8% 49.1% 50.3% 50.0% 57.9% 43.9% 2009 23/29 1.8 2.4 62.1% 59.4% 43.7% 56.0% 51.1% 53.5% 45.1%
33 2016 48/52 2.3 1.7 60.6% 63.9% 45.9% 53.4% 46.3% 56.7% 43.0% 2010 22/26 2.2 2.0 62.9% 56.2% 42.1% 50.0% 38.2% 51.0% 39.3%
34 2017 27/30 2.0 1.8 61.2% 60.7% 44.8% 48.6% 41.5% 54.7% 40.8% 2011 1/1 3.0 0.0 54.3% 31.6% 18.8% 14.3% 0.0% 25.7% 23.5%
35 2018 4/4 2.5 1.3 62.7% 59.7% 43.1% 65.0% 67.6% 53.7% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 479/610 2.3 2.2 58.7% 63.6% 47.0% 54.0% 47.9% 56.7% 44.1% — 128/377 2.0 2.6 61.3% 58.9% 43.7% 49.3% 44.5% 53.0% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberta Vinci Tathiana Garbin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2001 1485 96.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 0–1 — +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2002 1478 99.9 — — — — +62 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2003 1503 103.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 1–0 — -0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2004 1508 106.2 -1.92 -0.61 0.697 41.7% -7 -34 +121 39.3% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.44 1998 1476 99.1 — — — — — +30 — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 1–0 — +0.11
22 2005 1622 124.1 -1.45 -2.43 0.757 44.7% -68 -125 +118 50.0% -0.27 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 104.0 -0.41 1999 1468 104.0 — — — — +69 +4 — 40.0% -0.57 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.8 +1.10
23 2006 1576 114.9 -1.68 -1.84 0.869 47.1% -32 -53 — 40.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.35 2000 1619 130.4 — — — — -93 +74 — 50.5% +0.20 9–4 (69%) 6–6 (50%) 106.4 -0.40
24 2007 1561 120.8 -0.41 -1.67 0.937 48.4% -41 +8 +148 42.2% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 96.1 -0.85 2001 1575 127.1 — — — — -22 +73 — 46.3% -0.06 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 97.7 +0.37
25 2008 1585 114.9 +0.77 +1.74 1.048 51.2% -57 -7 — 45.8% -0.08 1–1 — — -0.36 2002 1600 121.8 — — — — -44 +115 — 51.3% -0.01 5–5 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 101.1 +0.83
26 2009 1665 136.6 +0.16 +1.03 1.008 50.1% -103 +34 +76 49.0% +0.10 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.7 -2.09 2003 1557 111.2 -0.57 -0.84 0.912 47.5% -9 +64 — 45.5% -0.44 6–6 (50%) 5–3 (63%) 101.4 +0.92
27 2010 1819 134.7 +0.73 -1.12 0.948 48.9% -39 -121 -80 54.6% -0.03 9–3 (75%) 9–3 (75%) 111.5 -2.49 2004 1547 122.1 +1.14 +0.66 1.149 53.5% +2 +76 — 42.9% -0.27 2–10 (17%) 3–7 (30%) 88.3 -0.03
28 2011 1775 135.8 +1.59 +0.80 1.056 51.2% -60 +21 +63 59.0% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 103.9 -0.43 2005 1559 119.9 -0.38 -1.30 0.916 48.0% -30 +111 — 43.5% -0.46 3–4 (43%) 5–5 (50%) 98.7 +0.08
29 2012 1832 144.5 +2.94 +2.39 1.122 52.5% +13 -119 +16 57.9% +0.71 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 102.8 -0.15 2006 1628 120.2 -2.20 -1.76 0.884 47.4% -84 +99 — 51.4% -0.03 4–6 (40%) 4–2 (67%) 100.7 +0.63
30 2013 1851 142.8 +2.57 +2.61 1.105 52.1% -29 +17 +6 60.2% +0.67 18–9 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.7 +2.38 2007 1659 123.9 -0.97 -0.08 0.977 49.1% -68 +117 -189 54.8% +0.26 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 105.3 +2.93
31 2014 1713 131.6 +0.37 +0.72 1.024 50.4% -31 +121 — 46.2% -0.03 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 90.3 +0.40 2008 1564 113.6 -2.43 -1.04 0.900 47.7% +44 +64 — 44.9% -0.54 5–7 (42%) 3–1 (75%) 98.8 -0.12
32 2015 1751 136.1 -0.58 +2.38 1.042 51.0% +8 -27 -60 54.2% +0.18 10–13 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.9 +1.44 2009 1607 121.1 -1.22 +0.36 0.971 49.5% -29 +75 — 50.0% -0.10 3–5 (38%) 2–2 (50%) 98.0 -0.47
33 2016 1719 138.5 +0.67 +0.43 0.992 49.9% +36 -63 -24 52.1% +0.05 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 +2.16 2010 1580 121.0 -2.83 -2.13 0.801 45.3% +22 +32 — 33.3% -1.42 6–2 (75%) 3–2 (60%) 106.1 -1.97
34 2017 1608 128.5 -1.05 -1.18 0.901 47.8% +12 +33 +88 36.2% -0.86 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -0.19 2011 1573 96.6 +1.82 +1.60 0.317 24.6% — — — 0.0% -6.00 — — — -0.20
35 2018 1628 117.8 -2.45 -0.08 0.852 47.1% +51 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.09 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1921 138.3 +0.89 +0.85 1.018 50.4% -19 -18 +49 51.4% +0.08 99–85 (54%) 67–61 (52%) 103.3 +0.02 — 1726 125.4 -1.64 -0.76 0.912 48.0% -23 +78 -189 46.5% -0.27 52–60 (46%) 41–35 (54%) 102.2 +1.01

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.