H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Roberta Vinci vs Tathiana Garbin H2H: 2-2
Roberta Vinci and Tathiana Garbin are tied 2–2 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Roberta Vinci leads 2–1 on clay, while Tathiana Garbin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Roberta Vinci won the 2010 Budapest third round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 43
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 49
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2010* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Roberta Vinci | 7-5 6-4 | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Feb 25, 2007* | Bogota | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Roberta Vinci | 6-7(4) 6-4 0-3 (ret.) | Tathiana Garbin | Match data |
| Jul 22, 2006* | Palermo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Tathiana Garbin | 6-2 6-2 | Roberta Vinci | Match data |
| Feb 14, 2002* | Doha | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Tathiana Garbin | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Roberta Vinci | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberta Vinci | #193 | #7 | 3,615 | 1,923 | 320 | 287 | 52.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Tathiana Garbin | #86 | #22 | 1,255 | 1,710 | 167 | 207 | 44.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Roberta Vinci | Tathiana Garbin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2001 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #184 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #121 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #41 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #126 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #85 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #42 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2008 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #84 | 1,585 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #71 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #63 | 1,663 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #82 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 28–20 | 58.3% | #38 | 1,817 | 0 | 3 | 2004 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #58 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #23 | 1,774 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #85 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 44–27 | 62.0% | #16 | 1,834 | 0 | 7 | 2006 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #38 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2013 | 46–23 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,853 | 0 | 9 | 2007 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #36 | 1,647 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2014 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #47 | 1,712 | 0 | 9 | 2008 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #55 | 1,564 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2015 | 31–26 | 54.4% | #15 | 1,765 | 0 | 9 | 2009 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #59 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | 2016 | 28–22 | 56.0% | #18 | 1,733 | 0 | 10 | 2010 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #87 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | 2017 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #116 | 1,610 | 0 | 10 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #86 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | 2018 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #193 | 1,628 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |