H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Roberta Vinci vs Venus Williams H2H: 0-5

Venus Williams holds a 5–0 lead over Roberta Vinci in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Venus Williams leads 5–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Venus Williams won the 2015 Zhuhai semifinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Roberta Vinci
ITA Age 43 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main-draw meetings
Venus Williams
United States Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Venus Williams #11 6-2 6-2 Roberta Vinci #15 Match data Nov 7, 2015* SF Zhuhai WTA 500 Hard
Venus Williams #24 5-7 6-2 7-6(4) Roberta Vinci #18 Match data Oct 2, 2015* SF Wuhan Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Venus Williams #41 7-6(2) 6-4 Roberta Vinci #15 Match data Oct 20, 2012* QF Luxembourg International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Venus Williams #4 6-4 6-1 Roberta Vinci #65 Match data Sep 1, 2010* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Venus Williams #5 6-1 6-4 Roberta Vinci #55 Match data Mar 28, 2010* R32 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS Olympics 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Roberta Vinci #193 #7 3,615 1,921 320 290 52.5% 0 0 0 0 1 9 10
Venus Williams #469 #1 7,452 2,368 782 299 72.3% 7 1 9 2 19 11 49

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Roberta Vinci Venus Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1994 1–1 50.0% — 1,525 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1995 2–3 40.0% #205 1,561 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1996 2–5 28.6% #216 1,570 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1997 20–13 60.6% #22 1,830 0 0
18 2001 1–2 33.3% #168 1,485 0 0 1998 51–13 79.7% #5 2,099 0 3
19 2002 3–5 37.5% #184 1,478 0 0 1999 57–12 82.6% #3 2,248 0 9
20 2003 2–2 50.0% #119 1,502 0 0 2000 41–4 91.1% #3 2,337 2 15
21 2004 4–8 33.3% #116 1,507 0 0 2001 46–6 88.5% #3 2,358 4 21
22 2005 15–17 46.9% #41 1,622 0 0 2002 63–9 87.5% #2 2,303 4 28
23 2006 10–16 38.5% #85 1,575 0 0 2003 24–5 82.8% #11 2,260 4 29
24 2007 11–17 39.3% #73 1,561 0 1 2004 42–14 75.0% #9 2,077 4 31
25 2008 5–6 45.5% #84 1,584 0 1 2005 34–10 77.3% #10 2,128 5 33
26 2009 23–23 50.0% #63 1,664 0 2 2006 13–6 68.4% #46 2,035 5 33
27 2010 28–20 58.3% #38 1,818 0 3 2007 46–10 82.1% #8 2,059 6 36
28 2011 37–24 60.7% #23 1,775 0 6 2008 40–11 78.4% #6 2,138 7 39
29 2012 44–28 61.1% #16 1,831 0 7 2009 38–16 70.4% #6 1,988 7 41
30 2013 46–23 66.7% #14 1,850 0 9 2010 38–7 84.4% #5 2,061 7 43
31 2014 21–26 44.7% #47 1,712 0 9 2011 8–4 66.7% #102 2,017 7 43
32 2015 31–26 54.4% #15 1,751 0 9 2012 24–9 72.7% #24 2,016 7 44
33 2016 28–24 53.8% #18 1,719 0 10 2013 15–11 57.7% #47 1,910 7 44
34 2017 10–20 33.3% #116 1,608 0 10 2014 33–15 68.8% #18 1,888 7 45
35 2018 1–3 25.0% #193 1,627 0 10 2015 39–14 73.6% #7 1,971 7 48
36 — — — — — — — 2016 24–15 61.5% #17 1,817 7 49
37 — — — — — — — 2017 38–15 71.7% #5 1,941 7 49
38 — — — — — — — 2018 15–11 57.7% #39 1,872 7 49
39 — — — — — — — 2019 20–15 57.1% #52 1,819 7 49
40 — — — — — — — 2020 1–8 11.1% #79 1,713 7 49
41 — — — — — — — 2021 3–9 25.0% #318 1,647 7 49
42 — — — — — — — 2022 0–4 0.0% #1000 1,602 7 49
43 — — — — — — — 2023 3–7 30.0% #412 1,592 7 49

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Roberta Vinci Venus Williams
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 — — — — — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 15 7 22 68.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2001 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 36 8 44 81.8% 9 2 11 81.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1999 34 6 40 85.0% 12 2 14 85.7% 4 1 5 80.0% 7 3 10 70.0%
20 2003 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2000 25 0 25 100.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 2004 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2001 32 3 35 91.4% 5 2 7 71.4% 7 0 7 100.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
22 2005 6 9 15 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 35 5 40 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 8 1 9 88.9%
23 2006 6 9 15 40.0% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2003 8 2 10 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 1 7 85.7% 4 0 4 100.0%
24 2007 1 7 8 12.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 2004 21 9 30 70.0% 17 2 19 89.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
25 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 18 7 25 72.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
26 2009 8 13 21 38.1% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 10 3 13 76.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2010 18 11 29 62.1% 8 7 15 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2007 27 5 32 84.4% 12 5 17 70.6% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
28 2011 15 16 31 48.4% 15 6 21 71.4% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2008 29 9 38 76.3% 4 2 6 66.7% 7 0 7 100.0% — — — —
29 2012 25 14 39 64.1% 10 9 19 52.6% 7 4 11 63.6% 2 1 3 66.7% 2009 21 11 32 65.6% 11 4 15 73.3% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
30 2013 25 15 40 62.5% 16 5 21 76.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 2010 19 3 22 86.4% 15 3 18 83.3% 4 1 5 80.0% — — — —
31 2014 12 17 29 41.4% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
32 2015 22 16 38 57.9% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2012 14 3 17 82.4% 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
33 2016 23 17 40 57.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2013 12 8 20 60.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — —
34 2017 7 14 21 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 27 11 38 71.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 2018 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 34 10 44 77.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 14 11 25 56.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 1 6 83.3% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 26 11 37 70.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 6 1 7 85.7% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 12 7 19 63.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 16 11 27 59.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 2 4 6 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
Career — 175 170 345 50.7% 101 83 184 54.9% 38 31 69 55.1% 6 6 12 50.0% — 487 189 676 72.0% 163 69 232 70.3% 98 27 125 78.4% 34 14 48 70.8%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 479/595 of Roberta Vinci's and 581/732 of Venus Williams's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Roberta Vinci Venus Williams
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2004 2/12 3.5 6.0 54.0% 52.5% 34.2% 54.2% 26.1% 44.0% 39.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2005 5/32 2.2 4.6 59.5% 57.8% 40.8% 62.1% 38.8% 51.1% 37.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2006 13/26 2.2 3.1 60.3% 61.8% 40.9% 56.5% 39.7% 53.1% 40.8% 2003 11/29 3.8 5.8 55.2% 76.2% 43.8% 53.3% 47.0% 61.6% 51.3%
24 2007 21/28 1.6 2.9 61.9% 60.3% 46.9% 51.2% 40.7% 55.0% 42.2% 2004 13/56 4.1 4.5 59.4% 72.2% 46.7% 41.6% 50.5% 61.9% 50.1%
25 2008 10/11 1.1 3.1 62.3% 60.5% 45.6% 45.6% 59.7% 55.0% 47.1% 2005 18/44 2.9 4.2 64.4% 70.7% 45.1% 63.1% 52.0% 61.3% 50.1%
26 2009 42/46 1.5 2.5 59.1% 62.6% 45.3% 54.1% 48.2% 55.6% 44.7% 2006 16/19 3.1 4.3 62.7% 68.3% 47.0% 52.8% 45.6% 60.6% 48.5%
27 2010 46/48 2.3 1.7 59.1% 60.5% 49.2% 52.3% 44.8% 55.7% 42.0% 2007 53/56 3.6 5.3 59.4% 72.6% 46.6% 56.6% 51.8% 62.2% 48.6%
28 2011 55/61 1.9 2.2 57.4% 65.2% 47.8% 53.6% 49.9% 57.7% 44.6% 2008 43/51 4.3 4.3 61.6% 72.0% 48.4% 55.6% 48.9% 62.7% 47.0%
29 2012 64/72 3.0 2.3 56.2% 66.8% 48.5% 56.0% 53.1% 58.7% 46.3% 2009 48/54 5.4 4.7 57.3% 73.4% 49.9% 59.5% 51.4% 63.3% 46.1%
30 2013 62/69 3.0 2.0 59.0% 64.8% 47.7% 57.7% 46.3% 57.9% 46.5% 2010 44/45 4.6 4.5 56.7% 73.5% 46.9% 53.7% 49.0% 61.9% 47.4%
31 2014 41/47 2.6 2.9 53.1% 65.0% 46.7% 55.4% 50.4% 56.4% 44.7% 2011 9/12 6.0 2.8 64.4% 72.3% 51.7% 60.3% 45.5% 64.5% 45.7%
32 2015 39/57 2.4 1.6 61.9% 63.8% 49.1% 50.3% 50.0% 57.9% 43.9% 2012 28/33 4.5 4.8 53.9% 68.9% 47.8% 50.7% 50.7% 59.2% 46.0%
33 2016 48/52 2.3 1.7 60.6% 63.9% 45.9% 53.4% 46.3% 56.7% 43.0% 2013 23/26 2.8 4.6 56.9% 65.4% 43.4% 55.0% 50.8% 56.0% 47.2%
34 2017 27/30 2.0 1.8 61.2% 60.7% 44.8% 48.6% 41.5% 54.7% 40.8% 2014 44/48 4.7 4.4 55.7% 71.6% 46.0% 56.6% 53.0% 60.4% 46.7%
35 2018 4/4 2.5 1.3 62.7% 59.7% 43.1% 65.0% 67.6% 53.7% 39.4% 2015 35/53 4.6 2.9 58.6% 70.6% 49.7% 50.2% 48.0% 62.1% 45.0%
36 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2016 37/39 3.1 3.9 61.5% 65.5% 48.1% 52.8% 52.7% 58.4% 46.8%
37 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2017 46/53 3.5 5.2 60.9% 69.2% 46.3% 59.1% 46.0% 60.2% 46.0%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2018 26/26 2.1 4.9 60.5% 63.9% 46.4% 53.6% 51.3% 56.7% 43.8%
39 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 34/35 1.8 3.7 63.2% 63.3% 43.3% 54.0% 45.9% 56.0% 43.6%
40 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2020 9/9 3.2 7.0 58.3% 63.2% 42.3% 61.2% 45.9% 54.5% 41.2%
41 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2021 12/12 3.4 4.4 62.1% 60.7% 37.2% 48.3% 44.1% 51.7% 39.2%
42 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 4/4 3.3 8.5 56.5% 65.1% 31.3% 49.0% 29.6% 50.4% 34.9%
43 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2023 10/10 3.6 4.4 60.1% 64.2% 38.7% 43.3% 39.2% 54.0% 40.5%
44 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2024 2/2 4.5 8.0 59.1% 60.9% 29.6% 49.4% 70.0% 47.9% 40.9%
45 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2025 4/4 3.5 5.5 54.2% 62.5% 31.3% 31.2% 48.2% 48.5% 40.7%
46 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2026 12/12 3.0 4.4 59.2% 63.3% 37.8% 46.5% 43.3% 53.3% 37.0%
Career — 479/610 2.3 2.2 58.7% 63.6% 47.0% 54.0% 47.9% 56.7% 44.1% — 581/1,081 3.8 4.5 59.3% 69.4% 46.1% 54.4% 49.2% 59.8% 46.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Roberta Vinci Venus Williams
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1526 122.1 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — -0.18
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1561 123.9 — — — — +29 — — 36.4% -0.36 1–0 0–1 — -0.31
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1570 134.2 — — — — +31 — — 46.7% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.34
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1831 160.2 — — — — +5 -255 -230 55.8% +0.44 8–5 (62%) 4–3 (57%) 108.3 -1.92
18 2001 1485 96.3 — — — — +32 — — 28.6% -0.86 1–0 0–1 — +0.48 1998 2100 174.0 — — — — +4 -331 -385 75.6% +2.04 9–4 (69%) 4–3 (57%) 108.8 -0.82
19 2002 1478 99.9 — — — — +62 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 0–3 (0%) — +0.60 1999 2248 179.2 — — — — +7 -300 -461 77.5% +1.83 10–5 (67%) 9–4 (69%) 105.8 -4.08
20 2003 1503 103.2 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.40 1–1 1–0 — -0.18 2000 2337 171.5 — — — — +16 -397 -317 84.0% +2.34 8–2 (80%) 6–3 (67%) 106.2 -2.30
21 2004 1508 106.2 -1.92 -0.61 0.697 41.7% -7 -34 +121 39.3% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–4 (20%) — -0.44 2001 2358 172.4 — — — — +31 -379 -127 83.8% +2.48 8–1 (89%) 10–3 (77%) 106.1 -1.53
22 2005 1622 124.1 -1.45 -2.43 0.757 44.7% -68 -125 +118 50.0% -0.27 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) 104.0 -0.41 2002 2303 175.2 — — — — +58 -205 -10 81.3% +2.44 12–4 (75%) 7–3 (70%) 101.1 -2.34
23 2006 1576 114.9 -1.68 -1.84 0.869 47.1% -32 -53 — 40.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 2–0 — +0.35 2003 2261 155.8 +4.06 +5.13 1.337 56.1% +107 -163 +33 81.0% +2.37 4–3 (57%) 1–2 (33%) 97.7 -1.73
24 2007 1561 120.8 -0.41 -1.67 0.937 48.4% -41 +8 +148 42.2% -0.56 3–7 (30%) 2–2 (50%) 96.1 -0.85 2004 2078 159.0 +4.27 +3.93 1.315 55.7% +59 +131 — 75.7% +1.99 6–3 (67%) 8–6 (57%) 99.4 +0.68
25 2008 1585 114.9 +0.77 +1.74 1.048 51.2% -57 -7 — 45.8% -0.08 1–1 — — -0.36 2005 2128 165.4 +4.52 +4.90 1.293 55.5% +29 +38 +223 75.0% +2.03 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 102.9 -2.36
26 2009 1665 136.6 +0.16 +1.03 1.008 50.1% -103 +34 +76 49.0% +0.10 7–5 (58%) 5–8 (38%) 103.7 -2.09 2006 2035 136.6 +3.30 +3.85 1.231 54.0% +67 +87 +280 63.8% +0.94 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 97.6 -0.08
27 2010 1819 134.7 +0.73 -1.12 0.948 48.9% -39 -121 -80 54.6% -0.03 9–3 (75%) 9–3 (75%) 111.5 -2.49 2007 2059 153.9 +5.55 +3.98 1.286 55.2% +31 +23 +331 79.0% +2.10 6–6 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 95.6 -1.59
28 2011 1775 135.8 +1.59 +0.80 1.056 51.2% -60 +21 +63 59.0% +0.58 9–5 (64%) 7–4 (64%) 103.9 -0.43 2008 2138 163.5 +7.00 +3.95 1.260 54.6% -5 -109 +293 74.6% +1.81 7–5 (58%) 5–6 (45%) 99.1 -1.46
29 2012 1832 144.5 +2.94 +2.39 1.122 52.5% +13 -119 +16 57.9% +0.71 11–6 (65%) 7–7 (50%) 102.8 -0.15 2009 1989 162.7 +7.24 +2.88 1.255 54.5% +47 -3 +361 65.1% +1.53 13–10 (57%) 3–12 (20%) 88.0 -2.55
30 2013 1851 142.8 +2.57 +2.61 1.105 52.1% -29 +17 +6 60.2% +0.67 18–9 (67%) 6–5 (55%) 103.7 +2.38 2010 2062 156.7 +5.33 +3.88 1.244 54.7% +31 -11 +294 79.6% +1.80 6–2 (75%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 +0.82
31 2014 1713 131.6 +0.37 +0.72 1.024 50.4% -31 +121 — 46.2% -0.03 5–9 (36%) 1–4 (20%) 90.3 +0.40 2011 2018 120.4 +4.82 +1.85 1.287 54.7% +52 — +278 70.8% +1.58 3–1 (75%) 0–2 — +0.19
32 2015 1751 136.1 -0.58 +2.38 1.042 51.0% +8 -27 -60 54.2% +0.18 10–13 (43%) 10–7 (59%) 99.9 +1.44 2012 2016 150.4 +3.65 +3.04 1.127 52.6% +82 +19 +154 65.4% +1.15 9–3 (75%) 5–5 (50%) 99.5 -1.94
33 2016 1719 138.5 +0.67 +0.43 0.992 49.9% +36 -63 -24 52.1% +0.05 11–6 (65%) 8–3 (73%) 103.8 +2.16 2013 1911 141.0 +0.75 +3.14 1.071 51.5% +85 +50 — 58.1% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 92.5 -0.63
34 2017 1608 128.5 -1.05 -1.18 0.901 47.8% +12 +33 +88 36.2% -0.86 4–5 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 95.9 -0.19 2014 1888 149.7 +4.15 +2.82 1.178 53.5% +57 +2 +268 66.4% +1.21 10–11 (48%) 5–6 (45%) 93.1 +0.59
35 2018 1628 117.8 -2.45 -0.08 0.852 47.1% +51 — — 33.3% -1.22 0–1 — — -0.09 2015 1971 157.4 +3.80 +3.44 1.187 53.2% +43 -131 +141 67.2% +1.27 13–4 (76%) 10–5 (67%) 105.5 -0.59
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2016 1818 133.2 +2.07 +3.27 1.126 52.8% +13 +15 +295 62.0% +0.67 5–9 (36%) 11–4 (73%) 95.7 +1.30
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2017 1941 149.8 +3.49 +3.26 1.155 53.0% -13 -79 +233 67.8% +1.01 11–6 (65%) 11–3 (79%) 106.7 -0.36
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2018 1873 141.1 +0.84 +1.05 1.013 50.4% +44 -80 +237 54.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.67
39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1820 145.6 +0.36 +1.07 0.992 50.0% +35 -40 +249 51.9% +0.05 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 -1.42
40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2020 1714 126.0 +0.01 -0.68 0.905 48.2% +47 — — 27.3% -1.14 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 90.8 -1.11
41 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2021 1647 111.7 -2.68 -2.16 0.811 45.9% +79 -9 — 29.6% -1.59 1–2 (33%) 0–2 — -0.85
42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1602 107.5 -2.82 -1.21 0.703 43.0% +66 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — 0.00
43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2023 1593 114.1 -1.10 -0.46 0.880 47.2% +55 — +447 40.0% -1.00 1–4 (20%) 3–1 (75%) 95.5 -0.01
Career — 1921 138.3 +0.89 +0.85 1.018 50.4% -19 -18 +49 51.4% +0.08 99–85 (54%) 67–61 (52%) 103.3 +0.02 — 2369 167.3 +3.54 +2.76 1.146 52.9% +33 -76 +111 68.9% +1.40 185–126 (59%) 137–101 (58%) 99.2 -2.45

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.