H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Robin White vs Catarina Lindqvist Ryan H2H: 3-1
Robin White holds a 3–1 lead over Catarina Lindqvist Ryan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Robin White leads 3–0 on grass, while Catarina Lindqvist Ryan leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin White won the 1991 Eastbourne second round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 19, 1991* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Robin White | 6-3 6-2 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jun 21, 1990* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Robin White | 6-2 7-5 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | 6-1 6-4 | Robin White | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1984* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Grass | Robin White | 4-6 6-3 6-3 | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | — | — | — | 1,989 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Robin White | Catarina Lindqvist Ryan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 5–10 | 33.3% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1984 | 28–16 | 63.6% | — | 1,790 | 0 | 2 |
| 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 44–18 | 71.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 3 |
| 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,881 | 0 | 3 |
| 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 34–20 | 63.0% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 3 |
| 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 3 |
| 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 29–19 | 60.4% | — | 1,785 | 0 | 3 |
| 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,726 | 0 | 4 |
| 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 25–22 | 53.2% | — | 1,716 | 0 | 5 |
| 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 14–15 | 48.3% | — | 1,658 | 0 | 5 |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |