H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Robin White vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 0-1
Claudia Porwik holds a 1–0 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1990 Indian Wells third round 5-7 7-5 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1990* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R32 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 5-7 7-5 7-6 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin White | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |