H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Robin White vs Elna Reinach H2H: 2-1
Robin White holds a 2–1 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Robin White leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Elna Reinach won the 1993 Auckland third round 6-4 5-7 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 4, 1993* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Elna Reinach | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Robin White | Match data |
| Feb 13, 1989 | Washington | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Robin White | 7-5 6-3 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| May 1, 1986* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Robin White | 6-1 6-4 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin White | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |