H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Robin White vs Etsuko Inoue H2H: 2-1
Robin White holds a 2–1 lead over Etsuko Inoue in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Robin White leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Etsuko Inoue won the 1990 Oklahoma fourth round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 61
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 23, 1990* | Oklahoma | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Etsuko Inoue | 7-6 6-1 | Robin White | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1989* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Robin White | 6-4 3-6 6-1 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
| Jun 28, 1989* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Robin White | 7-5 1-6 6-2 | Etsuko Inoue | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Etsuko Inoue | #310 | #26 | 27 | 1,803 | 120 | 132 | 47.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin White | Etsuko Inoue | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 17–15 | 53.1% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #68 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #70 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #80 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #30 | 1,765 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #52 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |