H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Robin White vs Isabelle Demongeot H2H: 0-4
Isabelle Demongeot holds a 4–0 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Isabelle Demongeot leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Isabelle Demongeot won the 1992 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 59
Right-Handed
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 1992* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Isabelle Demongeot | 6-2 6-3 | Robin White | Match data |
| Feb 23, 1989* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Isabelle Demongeot | 3-6 6-3 7-6 | Robin White | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1988* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Isabelle Demongeot | 7-6 2-6 6-3 | Robin White | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1987* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Isabelle Demongeot | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Isabelle Demongeot | #522 | #35 | 69 | 1,850 | 119 | 156 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin White | Isabelle Demongeot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #165 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #135 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #65 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #45 | 1,774 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #46 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #78 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #63 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 7–17 | 29.2% | #136 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #150 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #160 | 1,547 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |