H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Robin White vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 0-3
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 3–0 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1991 Sydney second round 4-6 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 1991* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 4-6 6-2 6-3 | Robin White | Match data |
| Jan 17, 1990* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 6-4 3-6 6-4 | Robin White | Match data |
| Nov 13, 1986* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 7-6 6-4 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin White | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |