H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Robin White vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 1-3
Larisa Savchenko holds a 3–1 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Larisa Savchenko leads 2–0 on carpet, while Robin White leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Larisa Savchenko won the 1988 Tokyo Pan Pacific third round 1-6 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 28, 1988* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 1-6 6-1 6-4 | Robin White | Match data |
| Apr 16, 1988* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Larisa Savchenko | 3-6 7-6 7-6 | Robin White | Match data |
| Jun 12, 1985* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Robin White | 4-6 6-1 6-4 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Jan 19, 1985* | Denver | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Larisa Savchenko | 6-2 2-6 6-2 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Robin White | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |