H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Robin White vs Leila Meskhi H2H: 3-1
Robin White holds a 3–1 lead over Leila Meskhi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Robin White leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Leila Meskhi won the 1990 Auckland semifinal 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
GEO
Age 58
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 1990* | Auckland | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Leila Meskhi | 6-4 6-2 | Robin White | Match data |
| Aug 21, 1989 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Robin White | 6-2 6-1 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Jun 15, 1988* | Eastbourne | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Robin White | 6-4 5-7 6-4 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
| Feb 24, 1987* | Key Biscayne | WTA 250 | R128 | Hard | Robin White | 6-3 6-4 | Leila Meskhi | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Leila Meskhi | #903 | #12 | 72 | 2,001 | 192 | 119 | 61.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin White | Leila Meskhi | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 11–7 | 61.1% | #46 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #30 | 1,794 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #19 | 1,928 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 30–14 | 68.2% | #15 | 1,937 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #22 | 1,939 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #37 | 1,874 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #34 | 1,843 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 5–2 | 71.4% | #141 | 1,834 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #838 | 1,748 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |