H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Robin White vs Marianne Werdel Witmeyer H2H: 0-1
Marianne Werdel Witmeyer holds a 1–0 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marianne Werdel Witmeyer won the 1992 Tokyo Nichirei fourth round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 1992* | Tokyo Nichirei | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | 6-1 6-3 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | — | — | — | 1,849 | 181 | 203 | 47.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Robin White | Marianne Werdel Witmeyer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,659 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 11–20 | 35.5% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 18–18 | 50.0% | — | 1,746 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 21–18 | 53.8% | — | 1,748 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 20–18 | 52.6% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 1 |
| 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 8–18 | 30.8% | — | 1,663 | 0 | 1 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |