H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Robin White vs Nana Smith H2H: 1-1
Robin White and Nana Smith are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Robin White leads 1–0 on grass, while Nana Smith leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nana Smith won the 1992 Taipei third round 3-6 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 1992* | Taipei | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Nana Smith | 3-6 6-3 6-0 | Robin White | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Robin White | 6-2 6-1 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin White | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |