H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Robin White vs Nicole Bradtke H2H: 0-3

Nicole Bradtke holds a 3–0 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Nicole Bradtke leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Nicole Bradtke won the 1992 Chicago round of 32 6-1 4-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Robin White
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
Nicole Bradtke
AUS Age 56 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nicole Bradtke #39 6-1 4-6 6-1 Robin White #47 Match data Feb 13, 1992* R32 Chicago Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Nicole Bradtke #54 7-6 6-1 Robin White #101 Match data Nov 1, 1991* R16 Scottsdale Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Nicole Bradtke #77 3-6 6-3 6-3 Robin White #48 Match data Jun 30, 1989* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Robin White #565 #15 37 1,878 142 158 47.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nicole Bradtke #394 #24 256 1,866 182 164 52.6% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Robin White Nicole Bradtke
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1985 1–2 33.3% #147 1,507 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1986 6–5 54.5% #123 1,548 0 0
17 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,504 0 0 1987 15–19 44.1% #78 1,599 0 0
18 1982 2–1 66.7% — 1,518 0 0 1988 24–17 58.5% #34 1,739 0 0
19 1983 1–4 20.0% — 1,493 0 0 1989 16–17 48.5% #61 1,710 0 0
20 1984 5–10 33.3% #105 1,495 0 0 1990 21–20 51.2% #49 1,757 0 0
21 1985 25–18 58.1% #32 1,763 0 1 1991 21–19 52.5% #45 1,759 0 0
22 1986 23–19 54.8% #16 1,789 0 1 1992 22–18 55.0% #47 1,710 0 1
23 1987 11–14 44.0% #56 1,742 0 1 1993 26–14 65.0% #26 1,756 0 2
24 1988 25–18 58.1% #38 1,765 0 1 1994 2–5 28.6% #153 1,704 0 2
25 1989 9–15 37.5% #88 1,688 0 1 1995 21–15 58.3% #37 1,785 0 3
26 1990 15–15 50.0% #59 1,710 0 1 1996 6–11 35.3% #94 1,708 0 3
27 1991 7–14 33.3% #101 1,636 0 1 1997 1–2 33.3% #394 1,696 0 3
28 1992 13–14 48.1% #56 1,622 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 1993 4–12 25.0% #119 1,568 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 1994 1–3 25.0% #281 1,539 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Robin White Nicole Bradtke
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 4 2 6 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 5 5 10 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1982 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 10 9 19 52.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
19 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1989 11 10 21 52.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1984 3 6 9 33.3% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 10 11 21 47.6% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
21 1985 11 6 17 64.7% — — — — 8 6 14 57.1% 6 6 12 50.0% 1991 14 10 24 58.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
22 1986 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 11 8 19 57.9% 1992 13 8 21 61.9% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1987 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1993 20 8 28 71.4% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1988 19 13 32 59.4% — — — — 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1995 13 9 22 59.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
26 1990 9 10 19 47.4% — — — — 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
27 1991 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1997 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1992 12 8 20 60.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 2 9 11 18.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 73 86 159 45.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 39 34 73 53.4% 27 34 61 44.3% — 106 83 189 56.1% 48 44 92 52.2% 18 23 41 43.9% 10 14 24 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Robin White Nicole Bradtke
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1508 116.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — +0.25
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1548 101.9 — — — — +44 -8 — 53.8% 0.00 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +2.05
17 1981 1505 105.7 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — -0.06 1987 1599 120.5 — — — — +20 -1 -62 44.3% -0.33 6–5 (55%) 2–5 (29%) 101.1 +1.69
18 1982 1518 105.9 — — — — +74 — — 71.4% +1.57 0–1 — — +0.70 1988 1739 135.8 — — — — -93 +65 -219 57.3% +0.23 7–7 (50%) 5–2 (71%) 104.0 -0.02
19 1983 1493 101.2 — — — — — — +63 30.8% -1.31 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — +0.29 1989 1711 134.8 — — — — -34 +69 -153 48.7% -0.16 7–5 (58%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 +0.32
20 1984 1495 103.9 — — — — +20 — +91 38.9% -0.67 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +1.14 1990 1758 145.1 — — — — -31 +44 -163 52.6% +0.22 6–9 (40%) 7–8 (47%) 97.9 -2.63
21 1985 1763 139.2 — — — — -10 — -118 55.8% +0.51 10–8 (56%) 4–3 (57%) 106.8 +0.41 1991 1760 142.2 — — — — +22 -3 -161 50.5% +0.33 9–6 (60%) 5–8 (38%) 98.9 -2.07
22 1986 1789 138.4 — — — — -24 -221 -17 51.0% -0.15 11–5 (69%) 4–4 (50%) 105.9 -1.55 1992 1710 137.2 — — — — +42 -8 -96 57.0% +0.69 4–9 (31%) 3–6 (33%) 92.0 +0.67
23 1987 1743 140.4 — — — — -18 — +37 51.7% -0.10 0–8 (0%) 4–3 (57%) 90.6 -1.00 1993 1756 140.3 — — — — +73 -52 -113 62.8% +1.01 4–2 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 101.7 +0.27
24 1988 1766 136.0 — — — — -10 — +22 56.9% +0.51 8–10 (44%) 8–4 (67%) 99.8 +1.25 1994 1705 114.0 — — — — +54 — — 33.3% -1.53 0–1 1–0 — +0.09
25 1989 1689 131.2 — — — — -9 — +56 45.0% -0.12 3–9 (25%) 1–6 (14%) 89.5 -0.91 1995 1786 146.5 — — — — -12 -47 -117 57.1% +0.64 6–6 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.7 -2.62
26 1990 1711 133.3 — — — — -36 — +99 50.0% -0.01 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 100.1 -0.04 1996 1709 125.5 — — — — +33 -3 — 43.2% -0.81 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 94.7 -0.45
27 1991 1636 120.4 — — — — -47 — +163 34.8% -1.02 2–2 (50%) 2–3 (40%) 99.1 +0.47 1997 1696 110.1 — — — — +26 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — -0.02
28 1992 1622 126.4 — — — — -14 — +161 47.6% -0.02 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 99.7 +1.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1993 1568 127.2 — — — — -40 — +234 33.3% -1.03 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 97.1 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1994 1540 105.6 — — — — -31 — — 40.0% -0.60 0–2 1–0 — +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1879 138.5 — — — — -18 -221 +31 48.7% -0.06 47–65 (42%) 31–33 (48%) 95.5 +0.79 — 1866 143.1 — — — — +7 +12 -133 52.8% +0.22 52–57 (48%) 38–42 (48%) 97.9 -0.72

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.