H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Robin White vs Stephanie Rehe H2H: 1-3
Stephanie Rehe holds a 3–1 lead over Robin White in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Stephanie Rehe leads 2–0 on carpet, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Robin White won the 1992 US Open second round 7-5 5-7 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 3, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Robin White | 7-5 5-7 6-0 | Stephanie Rehe | Match data |
| Sep 28, 1990* | Tokyo Dentsu | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Stephanie Rehe | 4-6 6-0 6-1 | Robin White | Match data |
| Oct 8, 1988* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Stephanie Rehe | 1-6 7-5 6-3 | Robin White | Match data |
| Mar 20, 1987* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Stephanie Rehe | 7-6 6-3 | Robin White | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin White | #565 | #15 | 37 | 1,878 | 142 | 158 | 47.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Stephanie Rehe | #156 | #10 | 60 | 2,000 | 134 | 98 | 57.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Robin White | Stephanie Rehe | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,471 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #182 | 1,461 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #18 | 1,805 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #19 | 1,824 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | 1981 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 17–8 | 68.0% | #28 | 1,868 | 0 | 3 |
| 18 | 1982 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,518 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,965 | 0 | 5 |
| 19 | 1983 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1984 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #105 | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #58 | 1,968 | 0 | 5 |
| 21 | 1985 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #32 | 1,764 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #123 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 22 | 1986 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #16 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #74 | 1,744 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 1987 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #56 | 1,742 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #156 | 1,758 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 1988 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #38 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1989 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #88 | 1,690 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1990 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1991 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #101 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1992 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #56 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1993 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #119 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1994 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,539 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |