H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Romina Oprandi vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 1-0
Romina Oprandi holds a 1–0 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Romina Oprandi leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Romina Oprandi won the 2006 Budapest fourth round 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SUI
Age 40
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2006* | Budapest | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Romina Oprandi | 7-5 6-4 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Romina Oprandi | #895 | #32 | 1,490 | 1,694 | 54 | 88 | 38.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Romina Oprandi | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #187 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #53 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #256 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #215 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2010 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #82 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #61 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #78 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2014 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #114 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #124 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #397 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |