H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 2-1

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on clay, while Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1985 Birmingham fourth round 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Anne Hobbs
GBR Age 66 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 14, 1985* Birmingham WTA 250 R16 Grass Anne Hobbs #63 6-3 7-5 Rosalyn Fairbank #33 Match data
May 29, 1985* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Rosalyn Fairbank #34 7-5 6-2 Anne Hobbs #63 Match data
Aug 25, 1983* Mahwah WTA 250 R32 Hard Rosalyn Fairbank 6-3 6-4 Anne Hobbs Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,933 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anne Hobbs #583 #35 18 1,842 174 164 51.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Anne Hobbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,525 0 0 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,576 0 2
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,720 0 0 1978 26–14 65.0% — 1,729 0 3
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,681 0 0 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,756 0 3
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,657 0 0 1980 26–18 59.1% — 1,755 0 5
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,904 0 0 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,920 0 1 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,752 0 7
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1985 13–12 52.0% #63 1,777 0 8
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,679 0 8
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,775 0 1 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,846 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,789 0 1 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,609 0 8
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,728 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —