H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Anne Hobbs H2H: 2-1

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 2–1 lead over Anne Hobbs in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 1–0 on clay, while Anne Hobbs leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Anne Hobbs won the 1985 Birmingham round of 16 6-3 7-5.

USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
GBR Age 67 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Anne Hobbs 6-3 7-5 Rosalyn Fairbank #33 Match data Jun 14, 1985* R16 Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Rosalyn Fairbank #34 7-5 6-2 Anne Hobbs Match data May 29, 1985* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Rosalyn Fairbank 6-3 6-4 Anne Hobbs Match data Aug 25, 1983* R32 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank — #15 51 1,932 336 310 52.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Anne Hobbs — #35 18 1,834 172 164 51.2% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Anne Hobbs
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1976 7–7 50.0% — 1,550 0 0
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0 1977 6–6 50.0% — 1,573 0 2
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0 1978 23–13 63.9% — 1,720 0 3
19 1980 22–21 51.2% — 1,673 0 0 1979 12–11 52.2% — 1,749 0 3
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0 1980 27–19 58.7% — 1,752 0 5
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,898 0 0 1981 22–18 55.0% — 1,825 0 5
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,919 0 1 1982 8–13 38.1% — 1,727 0 6
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1983 18–19 48.6% — 1,751 0 7
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1984 14–14 50.0% #59 1,736 0 7
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1985 13–12 52.0% — 1,777 0 8
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 1986 6–14 30.0% #99 1,680 0 8
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1 1987 14–11 56.0% #42 1,714 0 8
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1 1989 2–7 22.2% #231 1,610 0 8
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% — 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Anne Hobbs
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 6 4 10 60.0%
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1977 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
18 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1978 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
19 1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 4 7 42.9% 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1980 2 4 6 33.3% 13 4 17 76.5% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 8 14 42.9%
21 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5% 1981 1 3 4 25.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 10 6 16 62.5% 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 1983 7 3 10 70.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 4 7 11 36.4%
24 1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1984 1 4 5 20.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1985 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
26 1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 4 4 0.0%
27 1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1987 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 10 7 17 58.8% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1989 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
30 1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 71 122 41.8% — 19 31 50 38.0% 34 36 70 48.6% 71 50 121 58.7% 29 42 71 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Anne Hobbs
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1551 106.9 — — — — +100 — — 50.0% -0.13 1–3 (25%) — — +2.72
17 1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38 1977 1574 106.1 — — — — +108 -76 — 44.8% -0.31 4–1 (80%) 0–1 — +2.73
18 1979 1724 136.8 — — — — — -158 -4 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.54 1978 1720 125.0 — — — — -15 — -73 59.5% +0.81 8–4 (67%) 5–3 (63%) 105.9 +1.71
19 1980 1674 128.0 — — — — -91 -31 +40 51.5% +0.05 6–9 (40%) 1–0 — -0.24 1979 1750 138.2 — — — — -75 — -19 50.0% -0.20 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.78
20 1981 1657 123.2 — — — — -46 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 +0.56 1980 1752 132.6 — — — — -133 -51 -43 56.6% +0.60 8–6 (57%) 3–5 (38%) 100.9 -0.11
21 1982 1898 150.4 — — — — -183 -229 +26 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.76 1981 1825 132.4 — — — — -129 -98 -24 51.6% +0.07 10–5 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 104.7 -2.57
22 1983 1919 136.8 — — — — -80 -271 +30 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -2.28 1982 1728 117.2 — — — — -110 -94 +65 43.4% -0.13 4–7 (36%) 2–3 (40%) 95.7 -0.54
23 1984 1767 136.3 — — — — +21 -163 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.02 1983 1752 128.9 — — — — -64 -56 +25 47.7% -0.24 7–5 (58%) 4–4 (50%) 100.4 +0.58
24 1985 1807 136.9 — — — — -15 -144 +36 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.69 1984 1736 126.0 — — — — -107 -51 +109 50.7% -0.03 7–8 (47%) 4–1 (80%) 102.3 +0.76
25 1986 1825 143.0 — — — — +15 -155 -18 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.28 1985 1778 134.0 — — — — -156 — +123 51.9% -0.06 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.21
26 1987 1756 134.8 — — — — -59 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.44 1986 1680 122.2 — — — — -134 -59 +222 32.6% -1.09 3–3 (50%) 0–2 — -1.22
27 1988 1773 141.1 — — — — -53 -161 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.44 1987 1715 125.8 — — — — -121 — +118 53.6% +0.21 4–4 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 97.9 +1.55
28 1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -105 -204 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1788 137.4 — — — — -7 — +237 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60 1989 1611 99.5 — — — — -110 — +183 30.4% -1.52 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +1.06
30 1991 1637 127.8 — — — — +35 -73 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1727 133.0 — — — — -40 -177 +269 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -13 -176 +195 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1705 104.3 — — — — -16 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +22 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 143.7 — — — — -37 -133 +112 51.1% +0.08 105–88 (54%) 65–57 (53%) 104.8 -1.63 — 1835 133.0 — — — — -75 -67 +52 50.1% +0.01 63–54 (54%) 27–30 (47%) 100.4 +1.40

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.