H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Leslie Allen H2H: 3-1

Rosalyn Fairbank holds a 3–1 lead over Leslie Allen in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Rosalyn Fairbank leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Rosalyn Fairbank won the 1982 Eastbourne Open round of 64 6-3 3-6 6-0.

USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
3 – 1
4 main-draw meetings
USA Age 69 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rosalyn Fairbank 6-3 3-6 6-0 Leslie Allen Match data Jun 16, 1982* R64 Eastbourne Open WTA 250 Grass
Rosalyn Fairbank 6-3 6-1 Leslie Allen Match data Feb 5, 1982* R16 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Leslie Allen 7-6 3-6 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data Feb 5, 1981* R32 Detroit WTA 250 Carpet
Rosalyn Fairbank 1-6 6-3 7-5 Leslie Allen Match data Jul 24, 1980* R32 Richmond WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank — #15 51 1,932 336 310 52.0% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Leslie Allen — — — 1,887 87 123 41.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Leslie Allen
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1980 22–21 51.2% — 1,673 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0 1977 0–2 0.0% — 1,487 0 0
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,898 0 0 1978 0–3 0.0% — 1,458 0 0
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,919 0 1 1979 6–11 35.3% — 1,540 0 0
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,767 0 1 1980 12–21 36.4% — 1,606 0 0
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1981 27–23 54.0% — 1,774 0 1
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1982 25–22 53.2% — 1,820 0 1
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,756 0 1 1983 12–17 41.4% — 1,776 0 1
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1 1984 2–14 12.5% — 1,574 0 1
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,554 0 1
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1 1986 2–4 33.3% — 1,525 0 1
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 1987 0–2 0.0% — 1,508 0 1
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% — 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,599 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Leslie Allen
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1977 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5% 1978 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 1980 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 7 7 0.0%
24 1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1981 1 4 5 20.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 13 10 23 56.5%
25 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 12 10 22 54.5%
26 1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1983 0 4 4 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
27 1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 1 6 7 14.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1985 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
30 1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 71 122 41.8% — 12 31 43 27.9% 16 24 40 40.0% 25 24 49 51.0% 33 42 75 44.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Leslie Allen
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 1724 136.8 — — — — — -158 -4 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 1674 128.0 — — — — -91 -31 +40 51.5% +0.05 6–9 (40%) 1–0 — -0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1981 1657 123.2 — — — — -46 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 +0.56 1977 1488 100.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.50 0–2 — — +0.04
21 1982 1898 150.4 — — — — -183 -229 +26 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.76 1978 1458 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — — — +0.31
22 1983 1919 136.8 — — — — -80 -271 +30 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.3 -2.28 1979 1541 123.3 — — — — +64 +3 — 36.8% -1.10 2–2 (50%) 2–5 (29%) 99.3 +0.65
23 1984 1767 136.3 — — — — +21 -163 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.02 1980 1607 121.1 — — — — -92 -37 -60 39.0% -0.95 5–8 (38%) 5–1 (83%) 103.7 -1.83
24 1985 1807 136.9 — — — — -15 -144 +36 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.69 1981 1775 141.5 — — — — -91 -137 -74 52.1% 0.00 11–8 (58%) 6–3 (67%) 107.0 -2.51
25 1986 1825 143.0 — — — — +15 -155 -18 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.28 1982 1820 139.9 — — — — -123 -220 +4 51.0% +0.08 7–5 (58%) 5–7 (42%) 103.9 -0.98
26 1987 1756 134.8 — — — — -59 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.44 1983 1777 130.2 — — — — -41 -140 +38 43.9% -0.89 5–5 (50%) 3–2 (60%) 101.8 -0.95
27 1988 1773 141.1 — — — — -53 -161 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.44 1984 1575 92.4 — — — — +9 +42 +140 16.7% -2.42 2–2 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 97.4 -0.09
28 1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -105 -204 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.47 1985 1554 99.8 — — — — +29 — — 20.0% -2.80 — — — -0.17
29 1990 1788 137.4 — — — — -7 — +237 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60 1986 1525 100.2 — — — — — +33 — 37.5% -0.56 2–2 (50%) 0–4 (0%) 97.4 +0.67
30 1991 1637 127.8 — — — — +35 -73 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07 1987 1508 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.25 — 0–1 — -0.15
31 1992 1727 133.0 — — — — -40 -177 +269 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -13 -176 +195 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1705 104.3 — — — — -16 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +22 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1933 143.7 — — — — -37 -133 +112 51.1% +0.08 105–88 (54%) 65–57 (53%) 104.8 -1.63 — 1887 132.2 — — — — -63 -70 -13 42.4% -0.65 34–34 (50%) 22–26 (46%) 103.5 -2.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.