H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Pam Shriver H2H: 2-10

Pam Shriver holds a 10–2 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 5–1 on hard courts and 3–1 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1992 Oakland round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2 – 10
12 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver #33 6-2 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank #46 Match data Nov 5, 1992* R32 Oakland Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Rosalyn Fairbank #78 7-6 6-2 Pam Shriver #35 Match data Oct 25, 1991* R32 Brighton Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet
Pam Shriver #10 3-6 6-3 7-6 Rosalyn Fairbank #30 Match data Jul 22, 1989* SF Newport WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #3 6-2 6-1 Rosalyn Fairbank #44 Match data Jun 11, 1988* QF Birmingham WTA 250 Grass
Pam Shriver #4 7-5 6-0 Rosalyn Fairbank #40 Match data Jan 15, 1988* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Pam Shriver #5 6-1 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank #31 Match data Oct 2, 1986* R32 New Orleans WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver #6 6-1 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank #47 Match data Aug 9, 1986* SF Canadian Open WTA 500 Hard
Pam Shriver #3 6-4 7-6 Rosalyn Fairbank #31 Match data Aug 15, 1985* R32 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver #9 7-6 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank #38 Match data May 11, 1985* QF Australian Indoor WTA 250 Hard
Rosalyn Fairbank #47 6-2 6-3 Pam Shriver #3 Match data Oct 6, 1984* QF Manhattan Beach WTA 250 Hard
Pam Shriver 6-3 6-2 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data Oct 21, 1982* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Shriver 6-3 6-1 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data Sep 8, 1982* R16 US Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,932 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 5 19 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,813 0 1
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,054 0 2
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,137 0 4
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,677 0 0 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,098 0 5
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,162 0 8
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,897 0 0 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,918 0 1 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,118 0 14
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,766 0 1 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,255 0 20
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,755 0 1 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,598 0 1 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 70 121 42.1% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +104 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.06
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1813 147.5 — — — — +7 — -37 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.1 -0.83
17 1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38 1980 2055 163.4 — — — — -49 -406 -67 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 104.9 -7.03
18 1979 1724 136.7 — — — — — -159 -3 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.70 1981 2138 166.4 — — — — -89 -332 -9 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.74
19 1980 1678 128.5 — — — — -83 -36 +37 52.1% +0.08 6–8 (43%) 1–0 — -0.49 1982 2099 161.9 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.82
20 1981 1657 122.8 — — — — -41 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.67 1983 2163 167.8 — — — — +33 -321 +16 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.79
21 1982 1897 150.2 — — — — -180 -228 +28 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.75 1984 2061 163.5 — — — — +77 — +84 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.74
22 1983 1919 136.6 — — — — -79 -271 +29 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 -2.11 1985 2119 161.1 — — — — +48 -302 +85 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 +0.23
23 1984 1767 136.1 — — — — +21 -164 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.03 1986 2196 175.2 — — — — +23 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -4.63
24 1985 1806 136.7 — — — — -14 -143 +37 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.60 1987 2256 167.4 — — — — -1 — +39 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.44
25 1986 1824 142.9 — — — — +15 -154 -17 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.16 1988 2197 167.5 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.71
26 1987 1756 134.7 — — — — -60 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.46 1989 1961 141.0 — — — — +38 — +226 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.34
27 1988 1772 141.1 — — — — -53 -160 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.48 1990 1915 136.1 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -106 -205 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.49 1991 1823 146.6 — — — — -5 — +351 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.30
29 1990 1787 137.3 — — — — -6 — +236 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 1991 1637 127.7 — — — — +34 -74 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +6 — +300 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 1992 1726 133.0 — — — — -39 -176 +270 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -14 -176 +196 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22 1995 1649 116.2 — — — — -2 — +277 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 1994 1704 104.2 — — — — -15 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +23 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -20 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
Career — 1932 143.7 — — — — -36 -134 +112 51.1% +0.09 105–87 (55%) 65–57 (53%) 105.0 -1.56 — 2304 166.5 — — — — +10 -331 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.