H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Rosalyn Fairbank vs Pam Shriver H2H: 2-10
Pam Shriver holds a 10–2 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 12 main-draw meetings, Pam Shriver leads 5–1 on hard courts and 3–1 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1992 Oakland third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 65
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
2
–
10
12 main draw meetings
USA
Age 64
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1992* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-2 6-2 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Oct 25, 1991* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Rosalyn Fairbank | 7-6 6-2 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Jul 22, 1989* | Newport | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Pam Shriver | 3-6 6-3 7-6 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Jun 11, 1988* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Pam Shriver | 6-2 6-1 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Jan 15, 1988* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Pam Shriver | 7-5 6-0 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Oct 2, 1986* | New Orleans | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-1 6-2 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Aug 9, 1986* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | SF | Hard | Pam Shriver | 6-1 6-3 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Aug 15, 1985* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Pam Shriver | 6-4 7-6 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| May 11, 1985* | Australian Indoor | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Pam Shriver | 7-6 6-2 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Oct 6, 1984* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Rosalyn Fairbank | 6-2 6-3 | Pam Shriver | Match data |
| Oct 21, 1982* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Pam Shriver | 6-3 6-2 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
| Sep 8, 1982* | US Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Pam Shriver | 6-3 6-1 | Rosalyn Fairbank | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosalyn Fairbank | #325 | #15 | 51 | 1,933 | 336 | 309 | 52.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Pam Shriver | #234 | #3 | 163 | 2,302 | 624 | 277 | 69.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 20 | 24 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rosalyn Fairbank | Pam Shriver | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 23–8 | 74.2% | — | 1,849 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 16–16 | 50.0% | — | 1,798 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1978 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 47–21 | 69.1% | — | 2,027 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1979 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 58–25 | 69.9% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 4 |
| 19 | 1980 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 47–19 | 71.2% | — | 2,087 | 0 | 5 |
| 20 | 1981 | 15–22 | 40.5% | — | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 52–15 | 77.6% | — | 2,161 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1982 | 32–21 | 60.4% | — | 1,904 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 44–13 | 77.2% | #4 | 2,060 | 0 | 10 |
| 22 | 1983 | 24–19 | 55.8% | — | 1,920 | 0 | 1 | 1985 | 54–13 | 80.6% | #4 | 2,117 | 0 | 14 |
| 23 | 1984 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #32 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 47–15 | 75.8% | #5 | 2,194 | 0 | 16 |
| 24 | 1985 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #38 | 1,806 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 60–13 | 82.2% | #4 | 2,254 | 0 | 20 |
| 25 | 1986 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #28 | 1,824 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 58–14 | 80.6% | #5 | 2,188 | 0 | 24 |
| 26 | 1987 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #36 | 1,756 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 24–14 | 63.2% | #18 | 1,955 | 0 | 24 |
| 27 | 1988 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #37 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 8–5 | 61.5% | #66 | 1,911 | 0 | 24 |
| 28 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,846 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 21–18 | 53.8% | #37 | 1,822 | 0 | 24 |
| 29 | 1990 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #24 | 1,789 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #30 | 1,858 | 0 | 24 |
| 30 | 1991 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #90 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #38 | 1,819 | 0 | 24 |
| 31 | 1992 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #63 | 1,699 | 0 | 24 |
| 32 | 1993 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #63 | 1,766 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #110 | 1,649 | 0 | 24 |
| 33 | 1994 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,704 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #189 | 1,611 | 0 | 24 |
| 34 | 1995 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #261 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #234 | 1,635 | 0 | 24 |