H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rosalyn Fairbank vs Tanya Harford H2H: 0-1

Tanya Harford holds a 1–0 lead over Rosalyn Fairbank in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tanya Harford leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tanya Harford won the 1980 Salt Lake City round of 16 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosalyn Fairbank
USA Age 65 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tanya Harford
RSA Age 67 Right-Handed 162 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tanya Harford 6-1 6-3 Rosalyn Fairbank Match data Sep 12, 1980* R16 Salt Lake City WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosalyn Fairbank #325 #15 51 1,932 336 309 52.1% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Tanya Harford — — — 1,784 50 71 41.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Tanya Harford
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1974 0–1 0.0% — 1,496 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,479 0 0
17 1978 3–2 60.0% — 1,539 0 0 1976 4–5 44.4% — 1,512 0 0
18 1979 17–10 63.0% — 1,723 0 0 1977 7–13 35.0% — 1,559 0 0
19 1980 22–20 52.4% — 1,677 0 0 1978 3–6 33.3% — 1,558 0 0
20 1981 15–22 40.5% — 1,656 0 0 1979 13–10 56.5% — 1,716 0 0
21 1982 32–21 60.4% — 1,897 0 0 1980 12–20 37.5% — 1,673 0 0
22 1983 24–19 55.8% — 1,918 0 1 1981 8–10 44.4% — 1,630 0 0
23 1984 22–26 45.8% #32 1,766 0 1 1982 3–5 37.5% — 1,629 0 0
24 1985 28–23 54.9% #38 1,806 0 1 — — — — — — —
25 1986 23–20 53.5% #28 1,824 0 1 — — — — — — —
26 1987 21–20 51.2% #36 1,755 0 1 — — — — — — —
27 1988 27–22 55.1% #37 1,772 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 1989 27–18 60.0% #22 1,845 0 1 — — — — — — —
29 1990 26–20 56.5% #24 1,787 0 1 — — — — — — —
30 1991 14–19 42.4% #90 1,637 0 1 — — — — — — —
31 1992 16–16 50.0% #46 1,726 0 1 — — — — — — —
32 1993 17–19 47.2% #63 1,766 0 1 — — — — — — —
33 1994 0–4 0.0% #284 1,704 0 1 — — — — — — —
34 1995 2–8 20.0% #261 1,598 0 1 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Tanya Harford
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 — — — — — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 5 13 61.5% — — — — 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1980 3 6 9 33.3% 8 4 12 66.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1978 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
20 1981 3 4 7 42.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 9 13 30.8% 1979 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 5 8 13 38.5% 1980 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 3 9 12 25.0%
22 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 11 6 17 64.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 1981 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 1984 8 7 15 53.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 8 7 15 53.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 1982 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
24 1985 13 11 24 54.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 11 8 19 57.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 5 7 12 41.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 11 11 22 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 6 8 14 42.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 13 9 22 59.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 7 6 13 53.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 9 11 20 45.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 109 110 219 49.8% 44 51 95 46.3% 128 76 204 62.7% 51 70 121 42.1% — 15 22 37 40.5% 11 14 25 44.0% 15 19 34 44.1% 8 15 23 34.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosalyn Fairbank Tanya Harford
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1497 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.14
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1479 94.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.26
17 1978 1539 104.5 — — — — — — +66 75.0% +0.75 — 2–0 — +0.38 1976 1512 106.0 — — — — +67 +25 — 44.4% -0.61 0–2 1–0 — +0.59
18 1979 1724 136.7 — — — — — -159 -3 61.3% +1.02 4–4 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 101.5 +0.70 1977 1559 123.8 — — — — +23 +25 -88 38.3% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 98.8 +1.04
19 1980 1678 128.5 — — — — -83 -36 +37 52.1% +0.08 6–8 (43%) 1–0 — -0.49 1978 1559 111.9 — — — — +34 — — 41.7% -0.71 2–4 (33%) 0–1 — +0.55
20 1981 1657 122.8 — — — — -41 +16 +48 40.7% -0.51 7–5 (58%) 2–3 (40%) 103.2 +0.67 1979 1716 133.6 — — — — -51 — -60 51.8% -0.18 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 +1.24
21 1982 1897 150.2 — — — — -180 -228 +28 57.5% +0.52 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 105.2 -2.75 1980 1674 130.7 — — — — -52 — -27 40.0% -0.81 5–6 (45%) 2–4 (33%) 98.1 -2.35
22 1983 1919 136.6 — — — — -79 -271 +29 53.1% +0.19 7–3 (70%) 1–4 (20%) 101.2 -2.11 1981 1631 111.6 — — — — +32 -43 0 52.4% +0.12 2–6 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +2.28
23 1984 1767 136.1 — — — — +21 -164 +101 46.8% +0.05 7–8 (47%) 3–8 (27%) 94.2 +0.03 1982 1629 118.4 — — — — — -65 +42 44.4% -0.44 0–2 1–2 (33%) — -0.05
24 1985 1806 136.7 — — — — -14 -143 +37 51.3% +0.09 9–4 (69%) 9–2 (82%) 109.3 -1.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1986 1824 142.9 — — — — +15 -154 -17 52.5% +0.05 8–7 (53%) 5–4 (56%) 102.0 -2.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1987 1756 134.7 — — — — -60 -105 +159 50.0% +0.03 8–6 (57%) 5–1 (83%) 103.9 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1988 1772 141.1 — — — — -53 -160 +181 56.0% +0.38 7–11 (39%) 8–5 (62%) 98.3 +0.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1989 1845 147.2 — — — — -106 -205 +177 57.8% +0.54 7–5 (58%) 6–8 (43%) 101.7 -0.49 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1990 1787 137.3 — — — — -6 — +236 51.9% +0.13 11–3 (79%) 5–2 (71%) 108.9 +0.60 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1991 1637 127.7 — — — — +34 -74 +316 46.1% -0.10 3–7 (30%) 1–5 (17%) 88.8 +1.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1992 1726 133.0 — — — — -39 -176 +270 51.5% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 4–4 (50%) 100.5 -1.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1993 1766 146.5 — — — — -14 -176 +196 45.3% -0.44 9–5 (64%) 5–4 (56%) 104.6 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1994 1704 104.2 — — — — -15 — — 0.0% -3.63 — — — -0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1995 1599 97.0 — — — — +23 — +239 15.8% -2.47 0–1 — — +0.12 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1932 143.7 — — — — -36 -134 +112 51.1% +0.09 105–87 (55%) 65–57 (53%) 105.0 -1.56 — 1785 128.9 — — — — -15 -5 -32 44.0% -0.51 19–27 (41%) 12–14 (46%) 98.7 +2.85

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.