H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Rosie Casals vs Kathy Horvath H2H: 0-2
Kathy Horvath holds a 2–0 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kathy Horvath leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Horvath won the 1981 Hilton Head second round 6-4 3-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 77
Right-Handed
159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
USA
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 1981* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Kathy Horvath | 6-4 3-6 6-2 | Rosie Casals | Match data |
| Apr 2, 1981* | Boise | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Kathy Horvath | 7-5 2-6 7-6(13-11) | Rosie Casals | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosie Casals | #207 | #55 | — | 2,203 | 594 | 322 | 64.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 12 |
| Kathy Horvath | #283 | #10 | 24 | 1,977 | 192 | 155 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Rosie Casals | Kathy Horvath | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1968 | 36–14 | 72.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 1 | 1979 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 1969 | 42–19 | 68.9% | — | 1,874 | 0 | 1 | 1980 | 11–7 | 61.1% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 |
| 1970 | 52–21 | 71.2% | — | 2,035 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 34–23 | 59.6% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 2 |
| 1971 | 92–31 | 74.8% | — | 2,162 | 0 | 7 | 1982 | 15–17 | 46.9% | — | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 1972 | 64–26 | 71.1% | — | 2,098 | 0 | 10 | 1983 | 39–18 | 68.4% | — | 1,936 | 0 | 4 |
| 1973 | 81–28 | 74.3% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 | 1984 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #29 | 1,800 | 0 | 4 |
| 1974 | 43–16 | 72.9% | — | 2,127 | 0 | 12 | 1985 | 23–16 | 59.0% | #34 | 1,776 | 0 | 6 |
| 1975 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,995 | 0 | 12 | 1986 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #47 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 1976 | 39–17 | 69.6% | — | 2,122 | 0 | 12 | 1987 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #37 | 1,714 | 0 | 7 |
| 1977 | 41–20 | 67.2% | — | 2,044 | 0 | 12 | 1988 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #85 | 1,603 | 0 | 7 |
| 1978 | 24–15 | 61.5% | — | 2,019 | 0 | 12 | 1989 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #224 | 1,530 | 0 | 7 |
| 1979 | 19–26 | 42.2% | — | 1,824 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1980 | 14–25 | 35.9% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1981 | 12–14 | 46.2% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1982 | 4–8 | 33.3% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1983 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1984 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #172 | 1,610 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1985 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,574 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #207 | 1,548 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |