H2H data updated: 2026-10-30 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Marita Redondo H2H: 1-1

Rosie Casals and Marita Redondo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on carpet. Most recently, Marita Redondo won the 1978 Hollywood round of 32 1-6 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 78 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Marita Redondo
USA Age 70

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marita Redondo 1-6 6-2 7-5 Rosie Casals Match data Jan 12, 1978* R32 Hollywood WTA 250 Carpet
Rosie Casals 6-2 4-6 6-4 Marita Redondo Match data Feb 22, 1976* SF Detroit WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals — #6 — 2,213 594 323 64.8% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Marita Redondo — — — 1,917 141 118 54.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Marita Redondo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1969 5–1 83.3% — 1,569 0 1
14 — — — — — — — 1970 11–4 73.3% — 1,623 0 3
15 — — — — — — — 1971 3–3 50.0% — 1,640 0 3
16 — — — — — — — 1972 24–4 85.7% — 1,802 0 7
17 — — — — — — — 1973 29–16 64.4% — 1,869 0 8
18 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,772 0 8
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 1975 11–13 45.8% — 1,694 0 8
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 1976 16–17 48.5% — 1,786 0 8
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,770 0 8
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 1978 24–17 58.5% — 1,840 0 9
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 1979 11–19 36.7% — 1,758 0 9
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 1980 5–14 26.3% — 1,668 0 9
25 1974 43–17 71.7% — 2,136 0 12 1981 0–4 0.0% — 1,616 0 9
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,002 0 12 — — — — — — —
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 — — — — — — —
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,057 0 12 — — — — — — —
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,013 0 12 — — — — — — —
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,828 0 12 — — — — — — —
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,680 0 12 — — — — — — —
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,687 0 12 — — — — — — —
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,667 0 12 — — — — — — —
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,661 0 12 — — — — — — —
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,609 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,547 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Marita Redondo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 10 0 10 100.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2%
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% 1978 12 5 17 70.6% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 9 10 19 47.4%
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% 1980 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 52 30 82 63.4% 11 14 25 44.0% 20 17 37 54.1% 51 54 105 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Marita Redondo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1569 113.8 — — — — +113 — — 83.3% +2.42 — — — +1.54
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1623 120.3 — — — — +139 — — 68.8% +1.94 2–2 (50%) — — +3.88
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1640 107.8 — — — — — — -49 46.7% -0.13 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.5 0.00
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1802 133.1 — — — — +121 -257 -90 81.7% +2.48 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 105.3 +4.95
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1870 133.0 — — — — +64 -267 -112 61.6% +0.75 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 104.6 +0.62
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1772 96.7 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -1.25 0–2 — — +0.90
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 1975 1694 119.8 — — — — +67 -82 — 44.6% -0.52 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — +0.26
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 1976 1787 148.6 — — — — +68 -175 — 50.0% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 106.1 -0.32
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 1977 1771 99.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 1978 1841 142.3 — — — — +37 — -99 55.6% +0.12 8–4 (67%) 8–1 (89%) 109.6 +0.70
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -8.31 1979 1758 138.4 — — — — +44 — -49 35.9% -1.28 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.7 -0.59
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -10.99 1980 1669 116.9 — — — — +2 — — 28.6% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -1.03
25 1974 2136 163.5 — — — — +103 +14 +14 68.8% +1.15 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -9.26 1981 1616 96.7 — — — — +15 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — +0.39
26 1975 2003 147.3 — — — — +25 +90 +135 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1976 2128 162.5 — — — — +44 -45 +52 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1977 2058 157.4 — — — — +113 -43 +129 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1978 2014 156.7 — — — — +89 -40 +109 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 96.0 -3.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1979 1828 144.5 — — — — +54 +109 +234 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1980 1681 130.9 — — — — +19 — +233 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.1 -2.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1981 1687 134.5 — — — — +87 +183 +144 46.8% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 0–4 (0%) 91.4 +0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 1982 1668 113.9 — — — — +43 — +125 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 1983 1662 117.4 — — — — -25 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1609 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1574 92.4 — — — — +9 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1548 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1523 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1500 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2214 159.5 — — — — +65 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–120 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.0 -9.04 — 1917 138.7 — — — — +61 -189 -88 53.0% +0.20 41–25 (62%) 23–12 (66%) 113.7 +4.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.