H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Pam Shriver H2H: 0-1

Pam Shriver holds a 1–0 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1980 Richmond round of 16 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 78 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Pam Shriver 7-6 6-1 Rosie Casals Match data Jul 25, 1980* R16 Richmond WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rosie Casals — #6 — 2,213 594 323 64.8% 0 0 0 3 9 12
Pam Shriver — #3 163 2,304 626 278 69.2% 0 0 0 6 18 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,838 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,814 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1980 47–21 69.1% #9 2,057 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1981 58–25 69.9% #7 2,140 0 4
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,750 0 1 1982 47–19 71.2% #6 2,100 0 5
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,877 0 1 1983 52–15 77.6% #4 2,164 0 8
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,043 0 4 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,061 0 10
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,172 0 7 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,119 0 14
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,105 0 10 1986 47–15 75.8% #6 2,196 0 16
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,139 0 12 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,256 0 20
25 1974 43–17 71.7% — 2,136 0 12 1988 60–15 80.0% #5 2,197 0 24
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 2,002 0 12 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,960 0 24
27 1976 39–17 69.6% #6 2,127 0 12 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,915 0 24
28 1977 41–20 67.2% #6 2,057 0 12 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,823 0 24
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,013 0 12 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,857 0 24
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,828 0 12 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,680 0 12 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,700 0 24
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,687 0 12 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,667 0 12 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,661 0 12 1997 2–1 66.7% — 1,635 0 24
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,609 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,573 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% — 1,547 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,499 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rosie Casals Pam Shriver
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 6 1 7 85.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 11 6 17 64.7% 2 5 7 28.6%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 22 7 29 75.9% 3 2 5 60.0% 13 5 18 72.2% 9 7 16 56.3%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 15 5 20 75.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 19 3 22 86.4% 18 15 33 54.5%
19 1968 9 2 11 81.8% 5 2 7 71.4% 18 8 26 69.2% 4 2 6 66.7% 1982 11 4 15 73.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 15 4 19 78.9% 18 9 27 66.7%
20 1969 4 4 8 50.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 22 7 29 75.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 1983 17 3 20 85.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 13 3 16 81.3% 20 8 28 71.4%
21 1970 8 3 11 72.7% 29 8 37 78.4% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1984 10 3 13 76.9% — — — — 15 4 19 78.9% 19 6 25 76.0%
22 1971 14 4 18 77.8% 25 10 35 71.4% 22 8 30 73.3% 31 9 40 77.5% 1985 14 3 17 82.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 19 4 23 82.6% 19 4 23 82.6%
23 1972 16 6 22 72.7% 11 6 17 64.7% 13 6 19 68.4% 24 8 32 75.0% 1986 14 5 19 73.7% — — — — 10 1 11 90.9% 23 9 32 71.9%
24 1973 18 5 23 78.3% 20 5 25 80.0% 12 4 16 75.0% 31 14 45 68.9% 1987 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — 30 5 35 85.7% 17 5 22 77.3%
25 1974 6 4 10 60.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 23 7 30 76.7% 1988 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 24 4 28 85.7% 16 3 19 84.2%
26 1975 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 7 2 9 77.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 1989 12 7 19 63.2% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 5 4 9 55.6%
27 1976 4 2 6 66.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 25 12 37 67.6% 1990 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
28 1977 14 5 19 73.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 4 1 5 80.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1991 11 11 22 50.0% — — — — 7 3 10 70.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
29 1978 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% 1992 11 9 20 55.0% — — — — 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
30 1979 4 7 11 36.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 11 13 24 45.8% 1993 4 6 10 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
31 1980 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — 4 6 10 40.0% 7 12 19 36.8% 1994 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 5 7 28.6%
32 1981 7 4 11 63.6% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 2 4 6 33.3%
33 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 1 6 7 14.3% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
34 1983 4 5 9 44.4% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 1997 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 1984 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 121 75 196 61.7% 132 65 197 67.0% 144 69 213 67.6% 197 113 310 63.5% — 196 100 296 66.2% 18 12 30 60.0% 205 61 266 77.1% 204 104 308 66.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rosie Casals Pam Shriver
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1839 153.8 — — — — +102 — -258 69.2% +1.66 4–3 (57%) 7–3 (70%) 108.7 +0.78
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1815 147.6 — — — — +5 — -40 57.1% +0.36 0–8 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 93.2 -0.54
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2057 163.7 — — — — -46 -407 -68 68.7% +1.41 11–9 (55%) 8–7 (53%) 105.0 -7.43
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 2140 166.7 — — — — -89 -333 -10 71.3% +1.67 4–10 (29%) 10–6 (63%) 96.8 -6.71
19 1968 1751 130.0 — — — — +41 -201 -25 68.8% +1.61 7–9 (44%) — — +0.46 1982 2100 162.2 — — — — -1 -284 +23 69.7% +1.63 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 102.0 -2.30
20 1969 1878 140.7 — — — — -130 -92 +93 64.3% +1.09 12–6 (67%) — — -4.14 1983 2164 167.9 — — — — +34 -322 +15 73.1% +1.83 11–6 (65%) 7–5 (58%) 101.0 -4.97
21 1970 2043 161.0 — — — — -151 +10 +19 68.1% +1.60 11–5 (69%) 1–3 (25%) 104.5 -10.75 1984 2061 163.7 — — — — +77 — +83 75.8% +1.98 4–8 (33%) 7–2 (78%) 94.6 -0.72
22 1971 2173 168.5 — — — — +114 -75 -19 71.2% +1.62 18–13 (58%) 6–9 (40%) 96.2 -13.17 1985 2119 161.3 — — — — +48 -302 +86 75.7% +1.82 10–4 (71%) 13–7 (65%) 101.9 -0.54
23 1972 2106 158.7 — — — — +68 -51 +59 66.5% +1.41 15–7 (68%) 9–6 (60%) 102.7 -8.31 1986 2197 175.3 — — — — +22 — +26 75.9% +2.04 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 95.5 -5.27
24 1973 2139 165.9 — — — — +112 -17 +17 71.1% +1.70 15–13 (54%) 8–12 (40%) 96.6 -10.99 1987 2256 167.5 — — — — 0 — +38 78.5% +2.08 8–4 (67%) 6–3 (67%) 102.7 -3.72
25 1974 2136 163.5 — — — — +103 +14 +14 68.8% +1.15 6–8 (43%) 5–4 (56%) 96.0 -9.26 1988 2198 167.6 — — — — +37 — +105 76.5% +1.85 11–5 (69%) 8–6 (57%) 98.7 -3.89
26 1975 2003 147.3 — — — — +25 +90 +135 59.8% +0.83 5–9 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 89.5 -2.82 1989 1961 141.1 — — — — +38 — +227 60.0% +0.72 8–6 (57%) 2–2 (50%) 92.2 +0.50
27 1976 2128 162.5 — — — — +44 -45 +52 65.5% +1.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 102.3 -7.85 1990 1915 136.2 — — — — +25 — — 58.6% +0.83 2–1 (67%) 1–1 — +0.41
28 1977 2058 157.4 — — — — +113 -43 +129 64.5% +0.90 8–6 (57%) 6–5 (55%) 100.5 -6.67 1991 1823 146.7 — — — — -5 — +350 56.0% +0.62 1–5 (17%) 2–8 (20%) 88.5 -2.31
29 1978 2014 156.7 — — — — +89 -40 +109 57.0% +0.57 10–7 (59%) 1–5 (17%) 96.0 -3.72 1992 1857 156.5 — — — — +5 — +328 56.4% +0.71 5–3 (63%) 4–5 (44%) 101.5 -2.50
30 1979 1828 144.5 — — — — +54 +109 +234 46.6% -0.42 7–10 (41%) 6–2 (75%) 94.5 -3.07 1993 1820 148.3 — — — — +5 — +301 52.5% +0.05 4–7 (36%) 3–2 (60%) 95.2 -1.73
31 1980 1681 130.9 — — — — +19 — +233 40.4% -0.67 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 89.1 -2.38 1994 1700 125.8 — — — — +6 — +296 48.5% -0.04 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 95.7 +0.51
32 1981 1687 134.5 — — — — +87 +183 +144 46.8% +0.19 5–7 (42%) 0–4 (0%) 91.4 +0.33 1995 1650 116.2 — — — — -3 — +276 38.1% -0.64 4–2 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 +0.26
33 1982 1668 113.9 — — — — +43 — +125 39.3% -0.75 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.54 1996 1611 115.9 — — — — -22 — +337 39.3% -0.79 1–3 (25%) 1–1 — -0.33
34 1983 1662 117.4 — — — — -25 — +150 44.9% -0.27 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — -0.33 1997 1636 111.8 — — — — -19 — — 57.1% +0.86 1–0 0–2 — -0.20
35 1984 1609 94.3 — — — — — — — 18.2% -2.82 1–0 — — +0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 1985 1574 92.4 — — — — +9 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 0–1 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 1986 1548 97.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 1988 1523 93.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 1989 1500 89.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 1990 1491 100.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
42 1991 1476 94.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2214 159.5 — — — — +65 -31 +61 62.3% +0.97 134–120 (53%) 55–68 (45%) 91.0 -9.04 — 2304 166.7 — — — — +10 -332 +78 67.8% +1.37 103–105 (50%) 102–76 (57%) 97.2 -4.55

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.