H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Rosie Casals vs Pam Shriver H2H: 0-1

Pam Shriver holds a 1–0 lead over Rosie Casals in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Pam Shriver leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Pam Shriver won the 1980 Richmond fourth round 7-6 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rosie Casals
USA Age 77 Right-Handed 159 cm / 5'3"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main draw meetings
Pam Shriver
USA Age 64 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 25, 1980* Richmond WTA 250 R16 Carpet Pam Shriver 7-6 6-1 Rosie Casals Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Rosie Casals #207 #55 — 2,203 594 322 64.8% 0 1 0 2 9 12
Pam Shriver #234 #3 163 2,302 624 277 69.3% 0 0 0 4 20 24

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rosie Casals Pam Shriver
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1978 23–8 74.2% — 1,849 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1979 16–16 50.0% — 1,798 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1980 47–21 69.1% — 2,027 0 2
18 — — — — — — — 1981 58–25 69.9% — 2,122 0 4
19 1968 36–14 72.0% — 1,760 0 1 1982 47–19 71.2% — 2,087 0 5
20 1969 42–19 68.9% — 1,874 0 1 1983 52–15 77.6% — 2,161 0 8
21 1970 52–21 71.2% — 2,035 0 4 1984 44–13 77.2% #4 2,060 0 10
22 1971 92–31 74.8% — 2,162 0 7 1985 54–13 80.6% #4 2,117 0 14
23 1972 64–26 71.1% — 2,098 0 10 1986 47–15 75.8% #5 2,194 0 16
24 1973 81–28 74.3% — 2,122 0 12 1987 60–13 82.2% #4 2,254 0 20
25 1974 43–16 72.9% — 2,127 0 12 1988 58–14 80.6% #5 2,188 0 24
26 1975 20–14 58.8% — 1,995 0 12 1989 24–14 63.2% #18 1,955 0 24
27 1976 39–17 69.6% — 2,122 0 12 1990 8–5 61.5% #66 1,911 0 24
28 1977 41–20 67.2% — 2,044 0 12 1991 21–18 53.8% #37 1,822 0 24
29 1978 24–15 61.5% — 2,019 0 12 1992 25–18 58.1% #30 1,858 0 24
30 1979 19–26 42.2% — 1,824 0 12 1993 14–13 51.9% #38 1,819 0 24
31 1980 14–25 35.9% — 1,676 0 12 1994 13–16 44.8% #63 1,699 0 24
32 1981 12–14 46.2% — 1,692 0 12 1995 7–11 38.9% #110 1,649 0 24
33 1982 4–8 33.3% — 1,670 0 12 1996 4–9 30.8% #189 1,611 0 24
34 1983 9–12 42.9% — 1,662 0 12 1997 2–1 66.7% #234 1,635 0 24
35 1984 1–4 20.0% #172 1,610 0 12 — — — — — — —
36 1985 1–4 20.0% — 1,574 0 12 — — — — — — —
37 1986 0–2 0.0% #207 1,548 0 12 — — — — — — —
39 1988 0–2 0.0% — 1,523 0 12 — — — — — — —
40 1989 0–2 0.0% — 1,500 0 12 — — — — — — —
41 1990 0–1 0.0% — 1,491 0 12 — — — — — — —
42 1991 0–1 0.0% — 1,476 0 12 — — — — — — —