H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Rossana De Los Ríos vs Emilie Loit H2H: 1-0

Rossana De Los Ríos holds a 1–0 lead over Emilie Loit in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Rossana De Los Ríos leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rossana De Los Ríos won the 2008 Bogotá Open round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Rossana De Los Ríos
PAR Age 50 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Emilie Loit
FRA Age 47 Left-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Rossana De Los Ríos #116 7-5 6-3 Emilie Loit #55 Match data Feb 21, 2008* R32 Bogotá Open Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Rossana De Los Ríos #1,178 #51 788 1,622 64 120 34.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Emilie Loit #161 #27 1,016 1,779 162 180 47.4% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Emilie Loit
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1991 0–1 0.0% #268 1,488 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1993 5–8 38.5% #118 1,538 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1994 0–3 0.0% #462 1,504 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #243 1,498 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1998 3–5 37.5% #96 1,512 0 0
20 — — — — — — — 1999 3–15 16.7% #101 1,424 0 0
21 — — — — — — — 2000 4–6 40.0% #101 1,457 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2001 12–15 44.4% #95 1,547 0 0
23 1999 0–1 0.0% #270 1,488 0 0 2002 19–17 52.8% #58 1,625 0 0
24 2000 5–5 50.0% #76 1,523 0 0 2003 23–24 48.9% #41 1,673 0 0
25 2001 19–24 44.2% #54 1,601 0 0 2004 29–20 59.2% #45 1,668 0 2
26 2002 14–23 37.8% #88 1,553 0 0 2005 15–20 42.9% #82 1,548 0 2
27 2003 3–15 16.7% #149 1,449 0 0 2006 20–16 55.6% #56 1,622 0 2
28 2004 1–2 33.3% #200 1,454 0 0 2007 26–22 54.2% #43 1,618 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 2008 5–15 25.0% #137 1,518 0 3
30 2006 0–1 0.0% #205 1,448 0 0 2009 3–4 42.9% #161 1,533 0 3
31 2007 0–3 0.0% #125 1,425 0 0 — — — — — — —
32 2008 7–14 33.3% #95 1,437 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2009 6–9 40.0% #98 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2010 4–11 26.7% #178 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Emilie Loit
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1991 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 3 6 9 33.3% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 6 7 13 46.2% 12 8 20 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2000 2 3 5 40.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2003 10 11 21 47.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2004 6 11 17 35.3% 19 5 24 79.2% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2002 7 10 17 41.2% 5 9 14 35.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 2005 4 9 13 30.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2003 1 5 6 16.7% 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 5 8 13 38.5% 13 6 19 68.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
28 2004 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 9 11 20 45.0% 15 9 24 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1 7 8 12.5% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
31 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 2 3 5 40.0% 5 10 15 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 30 53 83 36.1% 30 56 86 34.9% 2 8 10 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — 51 80 131 38.9% 94 72 166 56.6% 10 14 24 41.7% 7 14 21 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 46/73 of Rossana De Los Ríos's and 84/242 of Emilie Loit's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Emilie Loit
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 8/47 1.3 2.4 62.2% 65.0% 52.9% 56.7% 36.8% 60.6% 43.0%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/49 1.5 3.0 58.5% 60.4% 45.6% 43.3% 45.3% 54.9% 39.2%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 5/35 1.4 3.0 52.1% 67.1% 43.2% 51.3% 48.2% 56.1% 48.6%
27 2003 2/18 0.0 3.0 64.5% 39.9% 37.3% 44.4% 0.0% 38.7% 24.6% 2006 15/36 2.3 2.4 63.3% 58.3% 46.8% 55.7% 48.5% 54.0% 45.5%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 31/48 1.8 3.0 64.1% 60.0% 45.7% 50.1% 49.0% 54.5% 45.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 15/20 2.0 2.9 66.4% 55.8% 37.9% 40.8% 41.0% 49.6% 39.2%
30 2006 1/1 2.0 1.0 70.1% 61.7% 25.0% 61.5% 66.7% 50.7% 41.4% 2009 6/7 2.7 3.5 62.6% 63.4% 43.1% 51.0% 60.7% 55.4% 40.8%
31 2007 1/3 0.0 1.0 79.0% 53.1% 35.3% 30.0% 62.5% 49.4% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 15/21 0.3 3.5 65.7% 52.5% 39.4% 54.9% 40.9% 48.3% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 14/15 0.3 3.7 63.5% 54.2% 40.3% 51.9% 41.5% 48.5% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 13/15 0.4 2.5 73.2% 54.7% 37.1% 50.7% 44.5% 49.7% 42.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 46/184 0.3 3.2 67.5% 53.3% 38.5% 51.9% 41.4% 48.4% 39.8% — 84/342 1.9 2.9 63.1% 60.1% 44.8% 49.9% 46.9% 54.3% 43.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Rossana De Los Ríos Emilie Loit
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1991 1489 100.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1993 1539 109.1 — — — — +11 +17 — 33.3% -1.78 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.4 -0.33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1994 1504 96.2 — — — — +9 — — 0.0% -3.67 — — — -0.04 1997 1499 112.1 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — -0.22
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1512 121.9 — — — — +45 +20 — 44.4% -0.11 0–2 0–1 — +0.24
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1424 101.4 — — — — +104 +28 — 26.2% -1.86 1–5 (17%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.55
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1458 109.0 — — — — +67 +11 — 45.8% -0.12 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.50
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1547 113.0 — — — — -32 -21 — 44.3% -0.61 4–5 (44%) 2–2 (50%) 99.5 +0.79
23 1999 1489 99.0 — — — — — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.09 2002 1626 113.6 — — — — -91 +30 — 52.4% -0.04 10–6 (63%) 4–3 (57%) 106.6 +0.19
24 2000 1523 109.6 — — — — -29 +54 — 45.0% -0.35 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.82 2003 1673 132.7 +2.59 +0.21 1.090 51.0% -71 +43 -104 49.1% -0.05 10–8 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 104.6 -1.57
25 2001 1601 120.5 — — — — -70 +48 — 43.3% -0.41 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 110.0 +0.59 2004 1668 124.9 -0.94 -1.99 0.870 46.7% -119 +171 -41 59.8% +0.45 9–6 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 102.5 +1.06
26 2002 1553 110.4 — — — — -15 +16 -14 42.2% -0.71 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 96.8 +0.94 2005 1549 112.1 -0.35 +0.26 1.107 52.4% -55 +179 — 48.8% -0.19 3–9 (25%) 4–3 (57%) 93.9 +1.69
27 2003 1450 99.1 -2.66 -3.40 0.402 31.8% +43 +9 — 21.1% -2.08 0–4 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.9 -0.26 2006 1622 125.1 -1.55 +0.33 0.990 50.1% -86 +130 — 55.7% +0.60 5–4 (56%) 5–8 (38%) 100.0 +1.39
28 2004 1454 110.2 — — — — +37 — — 42.9% -0.29 0–1 0–2 — +0.33 2007 1619 129.8 -0.93 +0.96 1.001 50.0% -37 +141 — 55.4% +0.37 7–4 (64%) 4–4 (50%) 104.3 -0.20
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1518 106.1 -4.05 -3.45 0.777 44.3% 0 +121 — 30.2% -1.60 2–3 (40%) 3–5 (38%) 97.4 -0.27
30 2006 1449 103.5 +0.91 +3.64 0.841 46.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — 0–1 — -0.16 2009 1533 118.8 +0.06 -0.68 0.916 48.8% +33 +65 — 44.4% -0.39 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.07
31 2007 1426 98.2 -0.36 -2.28 0.811 45.3% — — — 14.3% -2.57 0–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2008 1437 92.1 -4.65 -1.78 0.798 44.9% +40 -8 — 33.3% -1.78 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 100.2 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2009 1502 103.8 -3.71 -3.39 0.743 43.6% -10 -46 — 37.1% -1.34 4–1 (80%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2010 1480 107.1 -3.00 -0.28 0.835 46.1% +10 -51 — 31.3% -1.63 0–2 2–1 (67%) — -0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1623 110.4 -3.60 -1.81 0.772 44.3% -16 +7 -14 36.1% -1.15 18–26 (41%) 21–16 (57%) 101.5 +0.90 — 1780 125.3 -1.16 -0.31 0.956 49.0% -44 +99 -67 49.4% -0.12 54–58 (48%) 34–43 (44%) 98.9 +1.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.