H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Rossana De Los Ríos vs Greta Arn H2H: 2-0
Rossana De Los Ríos holds a 2–0 lead over Greta Arn in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Rossana De Los Ríos leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Rossana De Los Ríos won the 2002 Quebec City third round 0-6 7-6(2) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
PAR
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
HUN
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2002* | Quebec City | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Rossana De Los Ríos | 0-6 7-6(2) 7-6(4) | Greta Arn | Match data |
| May 29, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Rossana De Los Ríos | 6-3 6-4 | Greta Arn | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rossana De Los Ríos | #1,178 | #51 | 788 | 1,616 | 62 | 119 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Greta Arn | #448 | #40 | 1,370 | 1,695 | 58 | 91 | 38.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Rossana De Los Ríos | Greta Arn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 1991 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #268 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1993 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1994 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #462 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #152 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #118 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #270 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #91 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #76 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #288 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2001 | 19–24 | 44.2% | #54 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2002 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #88 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2003 | 3–15 | 16.7% | #149 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #225 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #200 | 1,454 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #162 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #235 | 1,557 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #125 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #88 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2008 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,437 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #63 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | 2009 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #114 | 1,555 | 0 | 2 |
| 34 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #178 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #421 | 1,536 | 0 | 2 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #406 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 |