H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sabina Simmonds vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 1-0

Sabina Simmonds holds a 1–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sabina Simmonds leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sabina Simmonds won the 1978 Sydney round of 64  .

H2H
1 0
1 main draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sabina Simmonds   Raquel Giscafre Match data Dec 6, 1978* R64 Sydney WTA 500 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sabina Simmonds 1,830 108 123 46.8% 0 0 0 1 5 6
Raquel Giscafre 1,798 86 120 41.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabina Simmonds Raquel Giscafre
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1974 0–2 0.0% 1,476 0 0
15 1975 2–4 33.3% 1,470 0 0
16 1976 5–7 41.7% 1,526 0 0
17 1977 3–9 25.0% 1,525 0 0
18 1978 15–15 50.0% 1,609 0 0
19 1979 15–10 60.0% 1,669 0 2 1968 5–8 38.5% 1,494 0 0
20 1980 6–10 37.5% 1,613 0 2 1969 9–15 37.5% 1,489 0 0
21 1981 21–10 67.7% 1,723 0 5 1970 3–2 60.0% 1,504 0 0
22 1982 26–22 54.2% 1,791 0 5 1971 5–13 27.8% 1,467 0 0
23 1983 11–22 33.3% 1,608 0 6 1972 6–16 27.3% 1,488 0 0
24 1984 2–6 25.0% 1,550 0 6 1973 11–11 50.0% 1,605 0 1
25 1985 2–2 50.0% 1,578 0 6 1974 26–17 60.5% 1,743 0 3
26 1986 0–2 0.0% 1,558 0 6 1975 15–18 45.5% 1,727 0 4
27 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,543 0 6 1976 2–3 40.0% 1,710 0 4
28 1988 0–1 0.0% 1,526 0 6 1977 2–6 25.0% 1,658 0 4
29 1978 1–8 11.1% 1,558 0 4
30 1979 1–1 50.0% 1,564 0 4
31 1980 0–2 0.0% 1,538 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sabina Simmonds Raquel Giscafre
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1974 0 2 2 0.0%
15 1975 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
16 1976 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
17 1977 3 6 9 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1978 6 6 12 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
19 1979 1 2 3 33.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1968 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1980 2 1 3 66.7% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1969 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1981 10 7 17 58.8% 1970 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1982 6 5 11 54.5% 7 6 13 53.8% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 8 17 52.9% 1971 3 8 11 27.3% 2 5 7 28.6%
23 1983 3 4 7 42.9% 5 7 12 41.7% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 8 8 0.0% 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 7 11 36.4%
24 1984 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0%
25 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1986 0 2 2 0.0% 1975 1 5 6 16.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1987 0 1 1 0.0% 1976 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1977 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1979 1 1 2 50.0%
31 1980 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 13 18 31 41.9% 43 55 98 43.9% 13 20 33 39.4% 14 19 33 42.4% 3 10 13 23.1% 67 66 133 50.4% 11 33 44 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sabina Simmonds Raquel Giscafre
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1974 1476 93.7 0.0% -3.75 +0.28
15 1975 1470 104.3 +49 46.7% -0.27 0–3 (0%) 1–0 +0.28
16 1976 1526 120.4 +53 +36 44.8% -0.41 2–3 (40%) 1–0 +0.28
17 1977 1526 117.1 +70 32.0% -1.68 1–2 (33%) 2–0 -0.63
18 1978 1610 123.2 -6 +1 -98 52.4% +0.14 2–7 (22%) 2–0 +1.86
19 1979 1670 120.9 -33 -8 -127 57.4% +0.19 3–1 (75%) 5–1 (83%) +3.43 1968 1495 94.8 -8 36.0% -1.24 0–1 -0.01
20 1980 1613 118.9 -2 -80 -124 47.1% +0.23 0–4 (0%) 2–2 (50%) +0.67 1969 1490 111.5 -2 40.4% -0.28 0–1 +1.55
21 1981 1723 130.1 -50 66.2% +1.58 6–3 (67%) 2–5 (29%) +3.30 1970 1505 104.3 +28 60.0% +1.10 +1.15
22 1982 1791 140.8 -56 -86 -193 55.7% +0.48 5–7 (42%) 5–3 (63%) -1.87 1971 1468 99.0 +19 -2 32.4% -1.76 1–3 (25%) +1.07
23 1983 1608 110.1 -21 +69 +13 38.5% -0.99 4–10 (29%) 3–5 (38%) +1.88 1972 1489 108.6 +89 -52 -8 31.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) -0.68
24 1984 1551 99.0 -13 29.4% -1.23 0–1 1–3 (25%) +0.79 1973 1606 135.2 +16 -154 52.5% +0.58 1–1 +1.95
25 1985 1578 117.8 50.0% -0.50 -0.84 1974 1743 135.9 -177 +93 -250 59.1% +0.59 8–5 (62%) 4–2 (67%) +0.72
26 1986 1558 98.2 20.0% -3.00 0–1 1–0 -0.13 1975 1728 134.7 -62 +89 47.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–3 (25%) +0.32
27 1987 1544 99.5 0.0% -2.50 +0.09 1976 1711 111.5 +86 40.0% -0.70 -0.40
28 1988 1527 93.7 0.0% -5.00 +0.15 1977 1658 103.2 +95 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–1 -0.01
29 1978 1559 95.5 -163 21.1% -1.95 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.61
30 1979 1565 101.2 40.0% -0.60 1–0 +0.11
31 1980 1539 91.4 0.0% -4.25 -0.22
Career 1830 128.7 -36 -3 -91 49.3% -0.05 23–42 (35%) 25–19 (57%) 95.8 +4.20 1798 123.7 -73 +40 -101 43.7% -0.47 18–23 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 98.7 +3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.