H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Sabina Simmonds vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 1-2
Yvonne Vermaak holds a 2–1 lead over Sabina Simmonds in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Vermaak leads 2–0 on clay, while Sabina Simmonds leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1983 Amelia Island second round 6-0 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 66
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1983* | Amelia Island | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-0 6-1 | Sabina Simmonds | Match data |
| May 7, 1982* | Perugia | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Yvonne Vermaak | 7-6 6-1 | Sabina Simmonds | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1982* | Houston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Sabina Simmonds | 7-6 6-3 | Yvonne Vermaak | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sabina Simmonds | — | — | — | 1,830 | 108 | 122 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sabina Simmonds | Yvonne Vermaak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1974 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1976 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1977 | 3–9 | 25.0% | — | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1978 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,619 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1979 | 15–10 | 60.0% | — | 1,673 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1980 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1981 | 21–10 | 67.7% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 5 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1982 | 26–22 | 54.2% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 5 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1983 | 11–22 | 33.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 6 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1984 | 2–6 | 25.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 6 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 6 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 6 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,542 | 0 | 6 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,525 | 0 | 6 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |