H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Sabrina Goles vs Neige Dias H2H: 0-1

Neige Dias holds a 1–0 lead over Sabrina Goles in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Neige Dias leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Neige Dias won the 1986 Charleston Open round of 32 6-1 7-6.

YUG Age 61 Right-Handed
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Neige Dias 6-1 7-6 Sabrina Goles #42 Match data Apr 24, 1986* R32 Charleston Open WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sabrina Goles #379 #27 25 1,843 114 119 48.9% 0 0 0 1 0 1
Neige Dias 1,748 75 75 50.0% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sabrina Goles Neige Dias
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1981 2–3 40.0% 1,493 0 0
15 1982 2–2 50.0% 1,497 0 0
17 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,482 0 0
18 1983 2–4 33.3% 1,508 0 0 1985 6–12 33.3% 1,527 0 0
19 1984 18–15 54.5% #55 1,700 0 0 1986 19–19 50.0% 1,610 0 0
20 1985 21–20 51.2% #29 1,691 0 0 1987 12–15 44.4% 1,647 0 1
21 1986 24–19 55.8% #30 1,780 0 0 1988 25–13 65.8% 1,712 0 2
22 1987 15–18 45.5% #64 1,711 0 1 1989 9–10 47.4% 1,673 0 2
23 1988 21–18 53.8% #59 1,715 0 1
24 1989 11–17 39.3% #105 1,624 0 1
25 1990 2–8 20.0% #205 1,548 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sabrina Goles Neige Dias
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1982 2 2 4 50.0%
17 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1983 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1985 1 3 4 25.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 1984 2 5 7 28.6% 15 7 22 68.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1986 6 7 13 46.2% 6 7 13 46.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
20 1985 10 7 17 58.8% 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 5 8 13 38.5% 7 4 11 63.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1986 8 5 13 61.5% 14 8 22 63.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1988 7 6 13 53.8% 18 7 25 72.0%
22 1987 4 7 11 36.4% 9 8 17 52.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 9 8 17 52.9%
23 1988 8 6 14 57.1% 13 10 23 56.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1989 2 4 6 33.3% 8 11 19 42.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1990 0 2 2 0.0% 2 6 8 25.0%
Career 35 37 72 48.6% 71 61 132 53.8% 1 6 7 14.3% 7 15 22 31.8% 19 27 46 41.3% 47 35 82 57.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sabrina Goles Neige Dias
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1981 1493 96.1 33.3% -1.17 2–0 1–0 -0.12
15 1982 1497 97.5 +31 50.0% -0.63 +0.58
17 1984 1482 98.6 33.3% -1.00 0–1 +0.16
18 1983 1509 109.0 +51 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–2 +0.36 1985 1528 114.5 +21 +57 28.9% -1.66 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) 105.9 -0.55
19 1984 1701 138.5 -131 +85 53.8% +0.38 6–8 (43%) 2–2 (50%) 101.1 -0.72 1986 1611 116.1 +2 -17 -16 50.6% -0.05 5–6 (45%) 4–2 (67%) 100.1 +4.40
20 1985 1692 134.6 -8 +31 51.6% +0.16 5–8 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 96.6 -1.00 1987 1648 123.5 -61 +20 46.8% -0.05 3–5 (38%) 2–3 (40%) 97.3 +1.34
21 1986 1780 140.5 -48 +31 54.5% +0.39 7–6 (54%) 4–4 (50%) 100.8 -3.16 1988 1712 129.5 -100 +84 62.1% +0.79 7–4 (64%) 5–0 (100%) 107.2 +2.97
22 1987 1711 126.3 -39 +76 45.9% -0.46 4–6 (40%) 3–2 (60%) 99.1 -0.47 1989 1674 112.9 +55 47.8% -0.46 4–4 (50%) 5–1 (83%) 101.3 +0.66
23 1988 1716 134.6 -30 +39 51.7% +0.18 6–3 (67%) 4–6 (40%) 99.8 -1.64
24 1989 1625 125.2 +45 +49 39.1% -0.50 5–5 (50%) 0–5 (0%) 95.0 -0.09
25 1990 1549 103.7 +46 19.0% -2.24 1–2 (33%) -0.04
Career 1843 137.8 -34 +51 48.6% -0.04 35–40 (47%) 18–24 (43%) 93.6 -2.90 1749 122.0 -40 +47 -16 49.3% -0.13 24–21 (53%) 19–7 (73%) 109.2 +6.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.