H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sachia Vickery vs Monica Puig H2H: 1-0
Sachia Vickery holds a 1–0 lead over Monica Puig in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sachia Vickery leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sachia Vickery won the 2014 Stanford fourth round 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PUR
Age 32
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2014* | Stanford | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Sachia Vickery | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1 | Monica Puig | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Monica Puig | #1,073 | #27 | 1,570 | 1,838 | 128 | 136 | 48.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sachia Vickery | Monica Puig | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #124 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #56 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #59 | 1,616 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #92 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #32 | 1,713 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #58 | 1,709 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 18–14 | 56.2% | #53 | 1,775 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #79 | 1,692 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #105 | 1,629 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1073 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |