H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC
Sachia Vickery vs Veronica Cepede Royg H2H: 1-0
Sachia Vickery holds a 1–0 lead over Veronica Cepede Royg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sachia Vickery leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sachia Vickery won the 2018 Auckland fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 31
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 34
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2018* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Sachia Vickery | 6-2 6-4 | Veronica Cepede Royg | Match data |
| Jul 30, 2017 | Stanford | WTA 500 | Q2 | Hard | Veronica Cepede Royg | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Sachia Vickery | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachia Vickery | #417 | #73 | 833 | 1,699 | 38 | 56 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Veronica Cepede Royg | #917 | #73 | 820 | 1,692 | 26 | 41 | 38.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sachia Vickery | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,474 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #101 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #129 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #75 | 1,626 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #138 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |