H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Sachia Vickery holds a 1–0 lead over Veronica Cepede Royg in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sachia Vickery leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sachia Vickery won the 2018 ASB Classic second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachia Vickery | 6-2 6-4 | Veronica Cepede Royg | Match data | Jan 4, 2018* | R16 | ASB Classic | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Veronica Cepede Royg | 6-3 4-6 7-5 | Sachia Vickery | Match data | Jul 30, 2017 | Q2 | Stanford | Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sachia Vickery | #464 | #73 | 833 | 1,698 | 38 | 57 | 40.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Veronica Cepede Royg | #917 | #73 | 820 | 1,690 | 26 | 44 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sachia Vickery | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #199 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #129 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2016 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #138 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #164 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2018 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #101 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2019 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #157 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #75 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #138 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2022 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #184 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #146 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #194 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Sachia Vickery | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | |||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | 2013 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 2012 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 2016 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2018 | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 2015 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2019 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 25 | 2020 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
| 26 | 2021 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 27 | 2022 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 25 | 33 | 58 | 43.1% | 9 | 18 | 27 | 33.3% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | — | 12 | 22 | 34 | 35.3% | 11 | 15 | 26 | 42.3% | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 88/95 of Sachia Vickery's and 65/68 of Veronica Cepede Royg's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Sachia Vickery | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1/2 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 56.3% | 62.5% | 38.7% | 20.0% | 50.0% | 52.1% | 53.6% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 6/7 | 1.3 | 4.5 | 57.4% | 57.3% | 41.5% | 53.8% | 34.6% | 50.3% | 45.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 9/12 | 3.1 | 3.9 | 58.6% | 59.7% | 50.3% | 54.5% | 40.7% | 55.7% | 39.2% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2016 | 11/11 | 2.5 | 2.8 | 56.8% | 59.9% | 48.2% | 58.0% | 41.4% | 54.8% | 43.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 9/10 | 1.3 | 3.8 | 56.9% | 60.6% | 42.3% | 53.5% | 56.7% | 52.9% | 48.4% | 2014 | 3/4 | 1.0 | 3.7 | 65.0% | 58.8% | 35.4% | 31.8% | 59.4% | 50.8% | 38.3% |
| 23 | 2018 | 19/20 | 0.9 | 3.5 | 59.6% | 58.7% | 49.0% | 59.5% | 46.6% | 54.5% | 46.9% | 2015 | 6/6 | 1.0 | 2.8 | 59.6% | 62.6% | 54.3% | 54.0% | 64.7% | 58.8% | 47.5% |
| 24 | 2019 | 11/11 | 1.6 | 4.2 | 60.1% | 59.9% | 43.1% | 45.5% | 41.1% | 53.0% | 42.6% | 2016 | 14/15 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 68.4% | 59.8% | 48.3% | 42.8% | 51.5% | 56.3% | 44.4% |
| 25 | 2020 | 2/2 | 0.5 | 3.0 | 65.9% | 64.7% | 52.4% | 32.5% | 45.2% | 60.5% | 46.2% | 2017 | 25/26 | 1.2 | 3.9 | 63.7% | 59.5% | 44.3% | 48.8% | 47.7% | 53.8% | 43.6% |
| 26 | 2021 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 46.8% | 37.9% | 39.4% | 50.0% | 40.0% | 38.7% | 48.5% | 2018 | 17/17 | 1.6 | 3.9 | 61.9% | 60.3% | 47.2% | 48.3% | 50.3% | 55.2% | 40.7% |
| 27 | 2022 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 59.2% | 44.8% | 40.0% | 25.0% | 28.6% | 42.9% | 41.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 10/10 | 3.1 | 2.9 | 60.3% | 64.3% | 44.9% | 44.2% | 42.5% | 56.5% | 44.0% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 8/8 | 1.4 | 3.3 | 53.6% | 63.1% | 39.5% | 45.4% | 39.1% | 52.4% | 43.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 88/95 | 1.8 | 3.6 | 58.3% | 60.0% | 45.5% | 51.4% | 43.5% | 53.9% | 44.5% | — | 65/70 | 1.3 | 3.5 | 63.9% | 60.0% | 46.5% | 47.1% | 51.3% | 55.0% | 43.1% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Sachia Vickery | Veronica Cepede Royg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1503 | 98.8 | -1.35 | +1.19 | 1.120 | 52.9% | — | — | — | 50.0% | -0.25 | — | — | — | +0.36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2014 | 1491 | 100.7 | -2.15 | +0.87 | 0.905 | 47.8% | +16 | — | — | 26.7% | -1.07 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2015 | 1503 | 98.8 | -2.03 | -1.64 | 0.887 | 47.7% | -17 | +31 | +124 | 39.3% | -1.21 | 3–1 (75%) | 5–0 (100%) | 107.1 | +0.37 | 2012 | 1492 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.05 |
| 21 | 2016 | 1521 | 102.6 | -1.47 | -1.18 | 0.962 | 49.1% | -24 | +17 | — | 46.2% | -0.19 | 2–2 (50%) | 3–1 (75%) | 101.7 | +0.96 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2017 | 1562 | 106.0 | -1.43 | +0.91 | 1.027 | 50.6% | -33 | — | — | 52.4% | +0.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +1.15 | 2014 | 1468 | 95.3 | -1.36 | -1.34 | 0.778 | 44.5% | — | +65 | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.31 |
| 23 | 2018 | 1621 | 129.2 | -0.64 | +3.43 | 1.031 | 50.8% | +41 | -118 | -7 | 51.1% | +0.09 | 1–6 (14%) | — | — | -0.78 | 2015 | 1487 | 110.2 | +0.96 | +1.62 | 1.153 | 53.1% | — | +51 | — | 57.1% | +0.79 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.36 |
| 24 | 2019 | 1566 | 112.8 | -2.90 | -1.45 | 0.907 | 47.4% | +18 | — | — | 36.0% | -1.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 2–0 | — | +0.70 | 2016 | 1521 | 115.2 | -0.05 | -0.12 | 1.016 | 50.2% | -24 | -22 | +151 | 41.7% | -0.25 | 3–3 (50%) | 1–3 (25%) | 98.5 | +0.56 |
| 25 | 2020 | 1584 | 109.3 | +1.68 | +1.36 | 1.170 | 53.4% | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.40 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.06 | 2017 | 1623 | 112.8 | -1.80 | +0.06 | 0.944 | 48.7% | -64 | 0 | +49 | 42.9% | -0.59 | 8–5 (62%) | 3–3 (50%) | 106.3 | +0.14 |
| 26 | 2021 | 1508 | 88.2 | +1.80 | -2.47 | 0.792 | 43.8% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | — | — | +0.14 | 2018 | 1561 | 120.5 | -0.88 | -1.25 | 0.909 | 48.2% | +21 | +25 | — | 34.1% | -1.00 | 1–6 (14%) | 3–1 (75%) | 96.7 | -0.31 |
| 27 | 2022 | 1527 | 106.2 | -0.05 | +2.53 | 0.729 | 42.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | -0.20 | 2019 | 1551 | 95.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2023 | 1572 | 113.5 | -0.99 | +0.54 | 1.011 | 50.0% | +5 | — | — | 38.1% | -0.67 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–0 | — | +1.47 | 2020 | 1516 | 95.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2024 | 1575 | 116.9 | -1.95 | -0.82 | 0.910 | 47.9% | -15 | +35 | — | 33.3% | -0.94 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | -0.21 | 2021 | 1490 | 101.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.04 |
| 30 | 2025 | 1547 | 103.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2026 | 1507 | 95.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1699 | 114.2 | -1.43 | +0.43 | 0.965 | 49.2% | +6 | +2 | +59 | 42.1% | -0.57 | 12–16 (43%) | 14–5 (74%) | 105.0 | +4.65 | — | 1691 | 114.4 | -0.91 | -0.24 | 0.959 | 49.1% | -29 | +20 | +93 | 40.5% | -0.62 | 12–18 (40%) | 9–8 (53%) | 99.7 | +1.64 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle Collins | 1 | 1 | 2 | Sep 19, 2023 | H2H |
| Taylor Townsend | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 2, 2020 | H2H |
| Magdalena Rybarikova | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 6, 2019 | H2H |
| Elise Mertens | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 5, 2018 | H2H |
| Naomi Osaka | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 14, 2018 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paula Cristina Goncalves | 3 | 1 | 4 | Apr 14, 2016 | H2H |
| Irina-Camelia Begu | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 28, 2018 | H2H |
| Karolina Pliskova | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jan 17, 2018 | H2H |
| Kristie Ahn | 2 | 0 | 2 | Sep 22, 2017 | H2H |
| Varvara Lepchenko | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 22, 2017 | H2H |