H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 16:30 UTC
Saisai Zheng vs Yingying Duan H2H: 3-0
Saisai Zheng holds a 3–0 lead over Yingying Duan in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Saisai Zheng leads 3–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Saisai Zheng won the 2019 Tianjin third round 7-6(4) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CHN
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2019* | Tianjin | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 7-6(4) 6-2 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
| Sep 19, 2019* | Guangzhou | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 6-7(5) 7-6(3) 6-1 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
| Sep 11, 2014* | Hong Kong | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Saisai Zheng | 7-6(1) 7-5 | Yingying Duan | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Saisai Zheng | #692 | #34 | 1,585 | 1,776 | 83 | 130 | 39.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Yingying Duan | #908 | #60 | 1,002 | 1,655 | 36 | 56 | 39.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Saisai Zheng | Yingying Duan | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #132 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #138 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #174 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #119 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #100 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–7 | 46.2% | #118 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 9–22 | 29.0% | #72 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #104 | 1,539 | 0 | 1 |
| 2016 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #85 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #90 | 1,584 | 0 | 1 |
| 2017 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #145 | 1,573 | 0 | 1 |
| 2018 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #38 | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #395 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #42 | 1,749 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #568 | 1,533 | 0 | 1 |
| 2020 | 6–4 | 60.0% | #41 | 1,767 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #79 | 1,687 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #692 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2025 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #692 | 1,493 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |