H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Samantha Reeves vs Natalie Grandin H2H: 1-0

Samantha Reeves holds a 1–0 lead over Natalie Grandin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Samantha Reeves leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Samantha Reeves won the 2001 Quebec City round of 32 4-6 6-3 6-0.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Samantha Reeves
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Natalie Grandin
RSA Age 45 Left-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Samantha Reeves #144 4-6 6-3 6-0 Natalie Grandin #229 Match data Sep 20, 2001* R32 Quebec City Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Samantha Reeves #864 #62 523 1,629 30 59 33.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Natalie Grandin #898 #144 244 1,500 1 14 6.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Samantha Reeves Natalie Grandin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1998 2–8 20.0% #111 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1999 4–8 33.3% #121 1,480 0 0 2001 0–3 0.0% #264 1,458 0 0
21 2000 1–4 20.0% #171 1,446 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2001 4–3 57.1% #106 1,515 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2002 8–14 36.4% #108 1,544 0 0 2004 0–2 0.0% #196 1,428 0 0
24 2003 8–10 44.4% #74 1,588 0 0 2005 1–2 33.3% #163 1,436 0 0
25 2004 3–12 20.0% #198 1,526 0 0 2006 0–4 0.0% #194 1,396 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #259 1,392 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2010 0–1 0.0% #545 1,382 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2011 0–1 0.0% #771 1,378 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Samantha Reeves Natalie Grandin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 5 7 12 41.7% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2004 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 2003 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2004 1 5 6 16.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2006 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 14 27 41 34.1% 11 22 33 33.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 5 8 37.5% — 0 10 10 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 8/33 of Samantha Reeves's and 6/10 of Natalie Grandin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Samantha Reeves Natalie Grandin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
24 2003 5/18 1.0 7.0 61.8% 57.8% 37.8% 49.5% 49.5% 50.1% 43.0% 2005 2/3 2.5 4.5 59.9% 70.5% 49.9% 64.3% 33.8% 62.1% 43.9%
25 2004 3/15 1.7 7.0 61.2% 44.9% 29.9% 42.6% 32.1% 39.1% 37.1% 2006 1/4 1.0 6.0 61.6% 60.4% 27.3% 42.9% 71.4% 47.7% 45.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 1/1 0.0 2.0 65.8% 40.0% 15.4% 40.0% 25.0% 31.6% 41.8%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 1.0 0.0 76.9% 55.0% 50.0% 42.9% 100.0% 53.8% 30.8%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 1/1 1.0 4.0 71.3% 47.8% 59.3% 53.3% 53.3% 51.1% 50.5%
Career — 8/89 1.3 7.0 61.6% 53.0% 34.9% 46.9% 43.0% 45.9% 40.8% — 6/15 1.3 3.5 65.9% 57.3% 42.0% 51.3% 52.9% 51.4% 42.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Samantha Reeves Natalie Grandin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1998 1480 114.3 — — — — +27 +68 — 29.2% -1.17 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1999 1481 106.1 — — — — +28 +49 — 34.6% -1.65 1–1 1–0 — +0.52 2001 1459 96.8 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.12 0–2 — — +0.14
21 2000 1447 92.1 — — — — — +34 — 18.2% -1.45 1–0 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2001 1515 113.3 — — — — +30 — — 47.1% +0.12 3–0 (100%) 1–0 — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2002 1545 121.7 — — — — +16 -68 — 42.6% -0.48 3–7 (30%) 4–5 (44%) 96.7 -0.91 2004 1429 90.6 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.60 0–1 — — +0.27
24 2003 1589 112.2 -1.00 +0.72 0.861 46.5% -29 -69 +14 41.0% -0.92 3–2 (60%) 2–0 — -0.54 2005 1436 104.9 +1.19 -0.66 1.158 52.5% — — — 42.9% +0.57 0–1 0–1 — -0.15
25 2004 1526 110.0 -3.84 -1.12 0.609 38.9% -9 -32 — 24.2% -1.70 3–2 (60%) 0–1 — -0.74 2006 1396 90.9 -2.96 -0.91 0.873 46.7% +5 — — 20.0% -2.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.05
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1392 98.7 -1.14 -2.14 0.611 37.6% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.13
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1383 98.2 -2.31 -4.38 0.667 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.08
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1379 101.1 -2.30 +1.90 1.031 50.7% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 0–1 — -0.10
Career — 1630 116.7 -2.07 +0.03 0.755 43.6% +12 -24 +14 35.8% -0.99 15–15 (50%) 8–9 (47%) 103.4 -1.18 — 1500 93.2 -1.06 -1.14 0.879 47.1% +5 — — 24.3% -1.89 0–7 (0%) 0–3 (0%) — +1.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.