H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Samantha Stosur vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 0-1
Chanda Rubin holds a 1–0 lead over Samantha Stosur in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Chanda Rubin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Chanda Rubin won the 2004 Athens Olympics second round 6-2 6-7(8) 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 42
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 50
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2004* | Athens Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Chanda Rubin | 6-2 6-7(8) 6-0 | Samantha Stosur | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Samantha Stosur | #531 | #4 | 6,195 | 2,071 | 454 | 340 | 57.2% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 9 |
| Chanda Rubin | #1,122 | #6 | 2,554 | 2,042 | 345 | 232 | 59.8% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Samantha Stosur | Chanda Rubin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #526 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 8–6 | 57.1% | #84 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #70 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #245 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #23 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #163 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #15 | 1,934 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2004 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–9 | 69.0% | #17 | 1,985 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2005 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #46 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #32 | 1,813 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2006 | 29–24 | 54.7% | #29 | 1,747 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #35 | 1,799 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2007 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #22 | 1,839 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2008 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #52 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 42–22 | 65.6% | #13 | 1,940 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2009 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,887 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,816 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2010 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #6 | 1,931 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 29–11 | 72.5% | #13 | 1,962 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2011 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #6 | 1,967 | 1 | 3 | 2003 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #9 | 1,917 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2012 | 40–24 | 62.5% | #9 | 1,873 | 1 | 3 | 2004 | 18–11 | 62.1% | #52 | 1,858 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2013 | 40–22 | 64.5% | #18 | 1,904 | 1 | 5 | 2005 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #545 | 1,820 | 0 | 7 |
| 30 | 2014 | 32–22 | 59.3% | #22 | 1,884 | 1 | 6 | 2006 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #486 | 1,718 | 0 | 7 |
| 31 | 2015 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #27 | 1,786 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2016 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #21 | 1,725 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2017 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #41 | 1,735 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2018 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #74 | 1,664 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 2019 | 14–16 | 46.7% | #99 | 1,631 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #112 | 1,607 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2021 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #382 | 1,518 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2022 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #529 | 1,508 | 1 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |